FSBW
Price
$43.22
Change
+$0.52 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
320.46M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCBS
Price
$35.86
Change
+$0.78 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBW vs MCBS

FSBW vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBW vs. MCBS commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBW is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2026
Stock price -- (FSBW: $43.22 vs. MCBS: $35.86)
Brand notoriety: FSBW and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBW: 726% vs. MCBS: 759%
Market capitalization -- FSBW: $320.46M vs. MCBS: $1.03B
FSBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $320.46M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSBW and MCBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSBW and MCBS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.67% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($1.03B) has a higher market cap than FSBW($320M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: MCBS (12.29) vs FSBW (9.72). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: 37.480 vs. FSBW (6.437). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FSBW (13.5M). FSBW has less debt than MCBS: FSBW (223M) vs MCBS (440M). MCBS has higher revenues than FSBW: MCBS (168M) vs FSBW (151M).
FSBWMCBSFSBW / MCBS
Capitalization320M1.03B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.43737.48017%
P/E Ratio9.7212.2979%
Revenue151M168M90%
Total Cash13.5M279M5%
Total Debt223M440M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSBW vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FSBW
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4591
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4828
SMR RATING
1..100
6047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (60) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBWMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRAX53.250.49
+0.93%
American Century Growth A
FRBCX31.730.29
+0.92%
JHancock Regional Bank C
QABGX23.280.06
+0.26%
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
HRLFX10.560.02
+0.19%
Hartford Real Asset F
CRBYX17.36-0.21
-1.20%
Columbia Acorn Inst3