Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs FSRPX
FSHOX vs FSRPX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs FSRPX
FSHOX vs FSRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. FSRPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Hold and FSRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. FSHOX (605M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: FSHOX (0.96) vs FSRPX (0.16). FSHOX was incepted earlier than FSRPX: FSHOX (40 years) vs FSRPX (41 years). FSHOX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). FSRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX (0) and FSRPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.14 vs. FSRPX (-18.39). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. FSRPX (-31.89).
| FSHOX | FSRPX | FSHOX / FSRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.400 | -6.473 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 605M | 2.19B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.16 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.14 | -18.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.04 | -9.20 | -185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.42 | -31.89 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.85 | 59.39 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement