Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Hold and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. RYLAX (4.82M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSHOX (0.96) vs RYLAX (0.07). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSHOX (40 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.68). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.12 vs. FSHOX (-15.14). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. RYLAX (-6.59).
| FSHOX | RYLAX | FSHOX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.400 | -5.670 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 605M | 4.82M | 12,554% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.07 | 1,469% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.14 | -10.12 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.04 | 26.50 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.42 | -6.59 | -371% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.85 | 53.62 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement