Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Hold and RYLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 640M vs. RYLAX (5.2M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSHOX (0.93) vs RYLAX (0.07). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSHOX (40 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.68). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. FSHOX (-4.09). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 34.01 vs. RYLAX (3.74).
| FSHOX | RYLAX | FSHOX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.648 | 1.079 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 5.2M | 12,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.07 | 1,402% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.09 | -0.65 | 633% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.20 | 36.17 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.01 | 3.74 | 910% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.16 | 60.55 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers