Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 662M vs. RYLCX (6.23M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSHOX (0.92) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSHOX (40 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.68). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). FSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. RYLCX (-1.64). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 39.83 vs. RYLCX (-11.82).
| FSHOX | RYLCX | FSHOX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.058 | -4.410 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 662M | 6.23M | 10,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.08 | 1,160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | -1.64 | -343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.28 | 29.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.83 | -11.82 | -337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.39 | 41.00 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement