Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. RYLCX (4.82M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSHOX (0.96) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSHOX (40 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.68). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. FSHOX (-15.14). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. RYLCX (-10.82).
| FSHOX | RYLCX | FSHOX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.400 | -6.166 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 605M | 4.82M | 12,554% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.08 | 1,251% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.14 | -10.80 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.04 | 23.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.42 | -10.82 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.85 | 39.83 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement