Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLCX
FSHOX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a StrongBuy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 700M vs. RYLCX (6.17M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSHOX (0.86) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSHOX (40 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.68). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FSHOX (16.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). FSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.59 vs. RYLCX (-6.42). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. RYLCX (-9.06).
| FSHOX | RYLCX | FSHOX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.025 | -3.231 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 700M | 6.17M | 11,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.08 | 1,101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.59 | -6.42 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 21.83 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.94 | -9.06 | -474% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.65 | 40.74 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement