FSM
Price
$8.41
Change
-$0.27 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.55B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
THM
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.24 (-9.96%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
571.3M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs THM

FSM vs THM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. THM commentary
Jul 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a Hold and THM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2026
Stock price -- (FSM: $8.42 vs. THM: $2.18)
Brand notoriety: FSM and THM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 107% vs. THM: 49%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $2.55B vs. THM: $571.3M
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.55B. THM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $571.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $10.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • THM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSM and THM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • THM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than THM.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while THM (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

THM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.36% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.55B) has a higher market cap than THM($571M). THM YTD gains are higher at: 17.204 vs. FSM (-14.169). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 743M vs. THM (-4.91M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 676M vs. THM (115M). FSM has higher revenues than THM: FSM (1.09B) vs THM (0).
FSMTHMFSM / THM
Capitalization2.55B571M446%
EBITDA743M-4.91M-15,129%
Gain YTD-14.16917.204-82%
P/E Ratio8.38N/A-
Revenue1.09B0-
Total Cash676M115M588%
Total Debt209MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs THM: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
THM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7858
SMR RATING
1..100
4492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (51) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as THM (54). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to THM’s over the last 12 months.

THM's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (78). This means that THM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THM (92). This means that FSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than THM’s over the last 12 months.

THM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (61). This means that THM’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as THM (100). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to THM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMTHM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
THM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUSB50.820.01
+0.02%
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
DGLO23.58N/A
N/A
First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF
TSMU76.08N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
RFV142.92-0.31
-0.22%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
PAMC53.79-0.89
-1.62%
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-3.00%
WPM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
AEM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-2.98%
PAAS - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
KGC - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-3.40%
AGI - FSM
80%
Closely correlated
-3.33%
More

THM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THM has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THM jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THM
1D Price
Change %
THM100%
-9.54%
CDE - THM
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.59%
PAAS - THM
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
WPM - THM
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
NEM - THM
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
FSM - THM
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More