FSS
Price
$113.98
Change
+$0.52 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
6.96B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOS
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.08 (-2.87%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
38.53M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSS vs XOS

FSS vs XOS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSS vs. XOS commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSS is a StrongBuy and XOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSS($6.96B) has a higher market cap than XOS($38.5M). XOS YTD gains are higher at: 49.724 vs. FSS (5.377). FSS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 484M vs. XOS (-25.46M). FSS has more cash in the bank: 62.8M vs. XOS (13.2M). XOS has less debt than FSS: XOS (18.2M) vs FSS (486M). FSS has higher revenues than XOS: FSS (2.45B) vs XOS (37.7M).
FSSXOSFSS / XOS
Capitalization6.96B38.5M18,073%
EBITDA484M-25.46M-1,901%
Gain YTD5.37749.72411%
P/E Ratio24.56N/A-
Revenue2.45B37.7M6,493%
Total Cash62.8M13.2M476%
Total Debt486M18.2M2,670%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSS: Fundamental Ratings
FSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSSXOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (FSS: $113.98 vs. XOS: $2.71)
Brand notoriety: FSS and XOS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSS: 63% vs. XOS: 7%
Market capitalization -- FSS: $6.96B vs. XOS: $38.53M
FSS [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $6.96B. XOS’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $38.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $223.29K to $376.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $26.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XOS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSS is a better buy in the long-term than XOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSS is a better buy in the short-term than XOS.

Price Growth

FSS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while XOS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -11.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -6.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

XOS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-6.07% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FSS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEGIX65.760.58
+0.89%
First Eagle Gold I
IFTSX10.89N/A
N/A
Voya International High Div Low Vol S
DLBMX18.64N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps A
SFGCX14.94N/A
N/A
NAA World Equity Income C
FFGCX29.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock

FSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSS has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSS jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSS
1D Price
Change %
FSS100%
+0.46%
ZWS - FSS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
ITT - FSS
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.03%
GNRC - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
WTS - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
NPO - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
More

XOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XOS and ASTE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XOS and ASTE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOS
1D Price
Change %
XOS100%
-2.87%
ASTE - XOS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
GENC - XOS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
FSS - XOS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
WNC - XOS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
TEX - XOS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
More