FSS
Price
$124.95
Change
+$0.40 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.63B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZWS
Price
$50.51
Change
+$0.39 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.38B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSS vs ZWS

FSS vs ZWS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) delivered a record-breaking fiscal year 2025 with net sales of $2.18 billion and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $4.23, fueled by aggressive M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and surging demand across municipal and industrial end markets.
  • Zurn Elkay Water Solutions (ZWS) posted 8% core sales growth in 2025 with industry-leading adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins of 26.1% and record free cash flow of $317 million, reflecting disciplined operational execution.
  • Both companies raised guidance entering 2026, but FSS is targeting double-digit adjusted EPS growth while ZWS is guiding for mid-single-digit core sales expansion and steady margin improvement.
  • FSS carries a higher beta (1.23) and a more acquisition-intensive growth strategy, while ZWS offers a lower beta (0.81), a stronger balance sheet with 0.4x net debt leverage, and a higher dividend yield.
  • Market sentiment around both stocks has been broadly constructive, though FSS shows greater sensitivity to infrastructure spending cycles, while ZWS is tied to non-residential construction and water quality regulation trends.
  • From an AI-driven perspective, the diverging growth profiles, risk characteristics, and sector exposures create a nuanced head-to-head that quantitative models would weigh carefully.

Introduction

Industrial and infrastructure-focused equities have drawn considerable attention in recent quarters as government spending, sustainability mandates, and reshoring trends reshape demand landscapes. Within this broad universe, FSS and ZWS represent two distinctly different approaches to capitalizing on these themes — one through environmental and safety equipment for municipalities and industries, the other through specification-driven water management solutions for commercial and institutional buildings. This comparison is designed for investors and traders seeking to understand how these two mid-cap industrial stocks stack up across growth momentum, profitability, risk exposure, and market positioning going into the second half of 2026.

FSS Overview and Recent Performance

Federal Signal Corporation (FSS), headquartered in Downers Grove, Illinois, is a century-old designer and manufacturer of environmental and safety solutions. The company operates through two primary segments: the Environmental Solutions Group (ESG), which produces street sweepers, sewer cleaners, vacuum trucks, and refuse collection vehicles, and the Safety and Security Systems Group (SSG), which manufactures public safety equipment, warning systems, and industrial signaling devices.

FSS delivered a record year in 2025, with full-year net sales reaching $2.18 billion — a 17% increase year over year — while adjusted EPS climbed 27% to $4.23. Fourth-quarter results were particularly strong: net sales surged 27% to $597 million and orders jumped 45% to $647 million, partly reflecting acquired backlog from the New Way refuse truck acquisition. The company has been executing an assertive M&A strategy, completing the acquisitions of New Way (refuse vehicles) in late 2025 and Mega Equipment (metal extraction support) in January 2026. Backlog stood at $1.04 billion at year-end, providing multi-quarter revenue visibility.

Recent stock performance reflects this operational momentum. FSS shares have traded in a 52-week range of approximately $101 to $135, with the stock recently near $119 and a market capitalization around $7.3 billion. The company's 2026 guidance calls for adjusted EPS of $4.50 to $4.80 on net sales of $2.55 billion to $2.65 billion, representing projected double-digit earnings growth at the midpoint. Analysts have noted that the company's expanding aftermarket parts business and vertical integration initiatives could provide incremental margin tailwinds over the medium term.

ZWS Overview and Recent Performance

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS), based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is a pure-play water management company that designs, procures, and manufactures a broad portfolio of specification-driven products — including commercial plumbing fixtures, water safety and control systems, flow systems, and filtered drinking water solutions. The company serves primarily commercial, institutional, and municipal end markets, with products specified by architects and engineers early in building design cycles.

For the full year 2025, ZWS reported net sales of $1.696 billion, representing 8% core sales growth, while adjusted EBITDA reached $442 million with margins expanding 120 basis points to 26.1%. Adjusted EPS grew 19% to $1.52, and the company generated a record $317 million in free cash flow. The fourth quarter showed continued momentum with 10% core sales growth and adjusted EBITDA of $104 million at a 25.6% margin. Notably, ZWS deployed $160 million toward share repurchases during the year and increased its quarterly dividend by 22%.

ZWS shares have meaningfully outperformed over the past twelve months, gaining roughly 28%, with a 52-week range spanning from about $37 to nearly $54. The stock recently traded near $48, equating to a market capitalization of approximately $8.1 billion. The company's balance sheet is notably conservative, with net debt leverage of just 0.4x at the end of 2025. For 2026, management guided toward mid-single-digit core sales growth, approximately 35% incremental adjusted EBITDA margins, and free cash flow of roughly $335 million. Jefferies initiated coverage with a Buy rating in late 2025, citing tailwinds from accelerating adoption of filtered drinking water and resilient institutional demand.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an analytical edge beyond conventional stock comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most relevant AI-powered trading bots for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of different tickers, each employing distinct trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from 5-minute and 15-minute intraday agents to 60-minute swing-trading models. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market dynamics earn a place in the Trending section. Recent performance data highlights annualized returns ranging broadly from approximately 50% to over 350% across various bot strategies in certain market environments, with win rates frequently above 60% and profit factors exceeding 2.0 in many cases. These bots span diverse sectors including industrials, infrastructure, semiconductors, and cross-asset portfolios, offering traders a broad toolkit for automated, data-driven decision-making. Explore the full selection of trending strategies at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both FSS and ZWS operate in the broader industrial sector, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles diverge meaningfully. FSS is an acquisition-heavy consolidator in the specialty vehicle and safety equipment space, generating substantial top-line acceleration through M&A — organic growth was 11% in 2025, but total sales grew 17%. ZWS, by contrast, is an organic-focused operator emphasizing margin discipline, cash generation, and shareholder returns; its 8% core sales growth was entirely organic.

On profitability, ZWS holds a clear edge in margin structure, with adjusted EBITDA margins of 26.1% versus FSS at approximately 20%. ZWS also converts a higher proportion of earnings into free cash flow, generating $317 million on $1.696 billion in sales, compared to FSS's $255 million on $2.18 billion. However, FSS is growing faster on the top and bottom lines, with adjusted EPS growth of 27% versus 19% for ZWS in 2025, and FSS's 2026 guidance implies continued double-digit earnings expansion compared to ZWS's more measured mid-single-digit outlook.

Sector exposure represents another key contrast. FSS is tied to municipal spending cycles, infrastructure appropriations, and industrial activity — areas that benefit from government stimulus but can be politically sensitive. ZWS is anchored in non-residential construction and water quality regulation, with specification-driven demand providing relative insulation from discretionary spending pullbacks. Geopolitically, FSS has some exposure to global metal extraction markets through recent acquisitions, while ZWS is predominantly North American.

Risk metrics further differentiate the two. FSS carries a beta of 1.23, indicating above-market sensitivity, and a P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of roughly 27. ZWS trades at a P/E near 39, reflecting premium valuation for its higher margins and cash flow consistency, but carries a lower beta of 0.81, suggesting more defensive characteristics. ZWS also offers a higher dividend yield at approximately 0.91% versus 0.50% for FSS.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Weighing the observable data — trend consistency, growth trajectory, margin quality, and relative positioning — Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find both stocks investable but for different strategy profiles. FSS appears better suited for momentum-oriented strategies: its powerful revenue acceleration, aggressive M&A pipeline, expanding backlog, and double-digit earnings growth outlook align with trend-following models that prioritize velocity and catalysts. The higher beta also makes it more responsive in directional market moves. Conversely, ZWS would likely appeal to stability-seeking AI models focused on consistency, margin resilience, and capital returns. Its sector-leading EBITDA margins, fortress balance sheet, record free cash flow, and lower volatility profile favor strategies that weight risk-adjusted returns and downside protection more heavily. In the current environment — characterized by elevated geopolitical uncertainty and cross-currents in industrial demand — an AI model optimizing for momentum and growth might lean toward FSS, while one prioritizing stability and cash-flow quality would probably favor ZWS. Neither stock is categorically superior; the preference depends entirely on the quantitative parameters embedded in the AI strategy being deployed.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FSS vs. ZWS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSS is a StrongBuy and ZWS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FSS: $124.95 vs. ZWS: $50.51)
Brand notoriety: FSS and ZWS are both not notable
FSS represents the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery, while ZWS is part of the Industrial Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSS: 97% vs. ZWS: 107%
Market capitalization -- FSS: $7.63B vs. ZWS: $8.38B
FSS [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $7.63B. ZWS’s [@Industrial Specialties] market capitalization is $8.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $375.29B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Specialties] industry ranges from $22.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $27.47B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Specialties] industry is $2.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSS is a better buy in the long-term than ZWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSS’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSS’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSS is a better buy in the short-term than ZWS.

Price Growth

FSS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +5.10% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +4.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-3.97% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

@Industrial Specialties (-1.86% weekly)

Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZWS($8.38B) has a higher market cap than FSS($7.63B). ZWS has higher P/E ratio than FSS: ZWS (31.37) vs FSS (26.93). FSS YTD gains are higher at: 15.378 vs. ZWS (9.141). FSS (484M) and ZWS (471M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ZWS has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. FSS (62.8M). FSS has less debt than ZWS: FSS (486M) vs ZWS (550M). FSS has higher revenues than ZWS: FSS (2.45B) vs ZWS (1.79B).
FSSZWSFSS / ZWS
Capitalization7.63B8.38B91%
EBITDA484M471M103%
Gain YTD15.3789.141168%
P/E Ratio26.9331.3786%
Revenue2.45B1.79B137%
Total Cash62.8M365M17%
Total Debt486M550M88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSS vs ZWS: Fundamental Ratings
FSS
ZWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1231
SMR RATING
1..100
4552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7782
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZWS's Valuation (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FSS (68) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.

FSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (31) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.

FSS's SMR Rating (45) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.

ZWS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FSS (50) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.

FSS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSSZWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNY0.970.02
+2.11%
MoneyHero Limited
FORM106.200.82
+0.78%
FormFactor
FTW11.390.04
+0.35%
Presidio Production Company
CUBWU11.05N/A
N/A
Lionheart Holdings
AMR137.16-6.65
-4.62%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources

FSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSS has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSS jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSS
1D Price
Change %
FSS100%
+0.32%
ZWS - FSS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
ITT - FSS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
GNRC - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
WTS - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
NPO - FSS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More

ZWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZWS
1D Price
Change %
ZWS100%
+0.78%
XYL - ZWS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
LECO - ZWS
70%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
HLIO - ZWS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
HLMN - ZWS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
PNR - ZWS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More