Advertisement
FSS vs GNRC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) vs. Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) has delivered superior recent momentum, with year-to-date gains of approximately 67% compared to Federal Signal Corporation's (FSS) 7%.
- FSS trades at a more attractive valuation, with a trailing P/E ratio of 29 versus GNRC's 82, alongside stronger recent quarterly revenue growth of 26.5% year-over-year.
- Both stocks operate in the industrials sector but target distinct niches: FSS focuses on municipal environmental and safety solutions, while GNRC emphasizes energy technology and power generation.
- GNRC benefits from catalysts like data center demand and energy storage growth, driving its one-year return to over 100%.
- FSS exhibits stability with robust order backlogs and positive earnings growth in recent quarters.
- Analyst price targets indicate potential upside for both, with FSS around $132 and GNRC near $212, relative to current levels.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FSS and GNRC, two industrials sector players offering distinct exposure to infrastructure and energy trends. Investors seeking diversified bets on municipal services, safety equipment, and power generation solutions may find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning. Traders focused on momentum versus stability, or those tracking sector rotations amid economic shifts, will benefit from insights into recent price behavior, growth drivers, and sentiment indicators. With both stocks showing resilience in recent market activity, this analysis highlights key contrasts for informed decision-making.
FSS Overview and Recent Performance
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) designs, manufactures, and supplies products for municipal, governmental, industrial, and commercial customers, primarily through its Environmental Solutions Group (street sweepers, sewer cleaners, vacuum loaders) and Safety and Security Systems Group (emergency vehicles, public safety equipment). The company also provides parts, service, rentals, and training.
In recent market activity, FSS has demonstrated steady performance, with shares trading around $116 and a market capitalization of $7.1 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at about 7%, building on a robust one-year gain of 52%. Key influences include strong quarterly revenue growth of 26.5% and earnings expansion of 21.6%, fueled by acquisitions, elevated demand across segments, and surging Q4 orders reaching $647 million alongside an upbeat 2026 outlook. These factors have supported positive sentiment, though shares remain below the 52-week high of $133.
GNRC Overview and Recent Performance
Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) designs, manufactures, and distributes energy technology products worldwide, including residential and commercial standby generators, portable generators, home energy storage, transfer switches, and microgrids. It serves customers via dealers, retailers, and e-commerce, with a focus on power outage solutions and emerging energy management.
Recent weeks have seen GNRC shares rally to approximately $226, reflecting a $13 billion market cap. Year-to-date performance exceeds 67%, with one-year returns surpassing 100%, outpacing broader markets. Despite a recent quarterly revenue dip of 11.6%, momentum stems from AI-driven data center expansion, energy storage growth, and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings. Positive analyst coverage and sector tailwinds in power infrastructure have bolstered sentiment, positioning shares near the 52-week high of $241.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These trending bots, numbering around 25, are chosen for their suitability to current market conditions, showcasing machine learning-driven signals in sectors like industrials, semiconductors, and energy. Performance stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns from +15% to +167%, win rates of 48% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in some cases. Strategies vary from short-term 5-minute trend trading with take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%) to longer 60-minute multi-agent approaches, including industrials-focused bots trading tickers like ETN and PWR. Explore these bots to align automated trading with prevailing trends—visit Trending AI Robots for real-time insights and copy-trading options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FSS and GNRC both anchor in industrials but diverge in business models: FSS relies on stable municipal and governmental contracts for environmental and safety gear, offering recurring service revenue, while GNRC targets cyclical residential/commercial power needs with growth from data centers and clean energy.
Growth drivers contrast sharply—FSS via organic demand and bolt-on acquisitions, GNRC through innovative storage and grid solutions. Recent momentum favors GNRC amid energy hype, but FSS shows superior financial consistency with higher ROE (19% vs. 6%) and positive growth metrics.
Risk profiles differ: GNRC's elevated P/E signals volatility tied to economic cycles and competition, versus FSS's lower leverage (debt/equity 43% vs. 52%) and defensive exposure. Market sentiment leans bullish on GNRC for transformative catalysts, while FSS appeals for relative value in infrastructure spending.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor GNRC in the current environment, given its superior trend consistency, explosive recent gains, and positioning amid data center and energy storage tailwinds. While FSS offers stability and better near-term fundamentals, GNRC's catalysts suggest higher probabilistic upside, though with elevated volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSS is a Buy and GNRC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNRC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GNRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNRC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GNRC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
FSS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +6.38% price change this week, while GNRC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +9.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
GNRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+2.57% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
@Industrial Machinery (+1.96% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FSS | GNRC | FSS / GNRC | |
| Capitalization | 7.16B | 17.4B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 458M | 511M | 90% |
| Gain YTD | 8.443 | 116.719 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.69 | 92.36 | 29% |
| Revenue | 2.34B | 4.33B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 71.4M | 266M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 583M | 1.49B | 39% |
FSS | GNRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSS's Valuation (65) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as GNRC (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
FSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNRC (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew significantly faster than GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
FSS's SMR Rating (45) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNRC (80) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
GNRC's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSS (47) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that GNRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSS’s over the last 12 months.
GNRC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSS (63) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that GNRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSS’s over the last 12 months.
| FSS | GNRC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 56% | 14 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
FSS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSS has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSS jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
GNRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNRC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNRC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNRC | 100% | +5.87% | ||
| FSS - GNRC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SWK - GNRC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| HLMN - GNRC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| ZWS - GNRC | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ETN - GNRC | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.32% | ||
More | ||||