FSV
Price
$172.82
Change
+$0.34 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.45B
27 days until earnings call
NMRK
Price
$12.34
Change
+$0.28 (+2.32%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.88B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSV vs NMRK

Header iconFSV vs NMRK Comparison
Open Charts FSV vs NMRKBanner chart's image
FirstService
Price$172.82
Change+$0.34 (+0.20%)
Volume$900
Capitalization7.45B
Newmark Group
Price$12.34
Change+$0.28 (+2.32%)
Volume$27.94K
Capitalization1.88B
FSV vs NMRK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSV vs. NMRK commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a StrongBuy and NMRK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FSV: $172.48 vs. NMRK: $12.06)
Brand notoriety: FSV and NMRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSV: 134% vs. NMRK: 96%
Market capitalization -- FSV: $7.45B vs. NMRK: $1.88B
FSV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $7.45B. NMRK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSV and NMRK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMRK’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMRK is a better buy in the short-term than FSV.

Price Growth

FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +7.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

NMRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.13% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($7.45B) has a higher market cap than NMRK($1.88B). FSV has higher P/E ratio than NMRK: FSV (73.74) vs NMRK (45.33). FSV YTD gains are higher at: -4.560 vs. NMRK (-5.423). FSV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 379M vs. NMRK (291M). FSV has more cash in the bank: 188M vs. NMRK (165M). FSV has less debt than NMRK: FSV (1.42B) vs NMRK (1.75B). FSV has higher revenues than NMRK: FSV (4.34B) vs NMRK (2.47B).
FSVNMRKFSV / NMRK
Capitalization7.45B1.88B396%
EBITDA379M291M130%
Gain YTD-4.560-5.42384%
P/E Ratio73.7445.33163%
Revenue4.34B2.47B176%
Total Cash188M165M114%
Total Debt1.42B1.75B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSV vs NMRK: Fundamental Ratings
FSV
NMRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4356
SMR RATING
1..100
6390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7687
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMRK's Valuation (44) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (77). This means that NMRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (56). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's SMR Rating (63) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (90). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

NMRK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FSV (56). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (87). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSVNMRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNWGX88.600.91
+1.04%
American Funds New World R6
EXOSX35.91N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series I
FOCSX17.28N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6
MIFOX31.48N/A
N/A
Marsico Focus Institutional
ICMBX13.00N/A
N/A
Intrepid Capital Investor

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
+0.65%
CIGI - FSV
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
CBRE - FSV
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
JLL - FSV
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
NMRK - FSV
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
CWK - FSV
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
More

NMRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMRK
1D Price
Change %
NMRK100%
+3.97%
JLL - NMRK
85%
Closely correlated
+3.71%
CBRE - NMRK
83%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
CWK - NMRK
80%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
MMI - NMRK
74%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
CIGI - NMRK
72%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More