FTEC
Price
$287.68
Change
+$1.14 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
21B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSI
Price
$184.45
Change
+$6.22 (+3.49%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
2.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTEC vs PSI

FTEC vs PSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI)

Key Takeaways

  • FTEC offers broad exposure to the U.S. information technology sector with 284 holdings, while PSI provides concentrated exposure to 31 semiconductor companies using a dynamic, multi-factor strategy.
  • FTEC's expense ratio of 0.08% is significantly lower than PSI's 0.56%, favoring cost-conscious long-term investors.
  • Top holdings in FTEC include mega-caps like NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), and MSFT (9.9%), representing nearly 60% of assets; PSI emphasizes semiconductor leaders like MXL (~8-10%), AMD (~7%), and MU (~6%).
  • Both ETFs exhibit high volatility tied to technology cycles, but PSI's narrower focus amplifies risk and potential reward in semiconductor uptrends.
  • FTEC suits diversified sector plays; PSI targets high-growth subsector momentum driven by AI and chip demand.
  • Liquidity is strong for both, with FTEC averaging over 400,000 shares daily and PSI around 280,000.

Introduction

In the current market environment, technology ETFs like FTEC and PSI offer distinct pathways to capture growth in the information technology sector, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. FTEC provides comprehensive exposure to the broad U.S. IT universe, while PSI hones in on semiconductors—a critical subsector powering AI advancements. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary options: FTEC for balanced sector allocation and PSI for targeted bets on chipmakers amid surging capital expenditures (CapEx) by hyperscalers. With tech inflows rebounding and semiconductor sales projected toward $1 trillion annually, comparing their structures helps investors align with sector rotation and thematic trends.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passive ETF that tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. equities in the information technology sector. Launched in 2013, it holds 284 stocks with an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.08% and manages approximately $19 billion in assets under management (AUM). Top holdings include NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.9%), and MU (2.6%), accounting for about 60% of assets. Sector allocation is dominated by electronic technology (66%), technology services (28%), and producer manufacturing (4%). The fund rebalances in line with the index's quarterly methodology, emphasizing market-cap weighting with 25/50 concentration caps to mitigate single-stock risk. Its broad diversification and low costs make it a core holding for tech sector exposure.

Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI), formerly PowerShares Dynamic Semiconductors Portfolio, is a passive multi-factor ETF tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index. Inception in 2005, it features 31 holdings, an expense ratio of 0.56%, and roughly $2.2 billion in AUM. Key holdings comprise MXL (~9-10%), AMD (~7%), MU (~6%), TXN (~4.5%), and AVGO (~4.8%), with top 10 at ~50% of assets. Allocation skews to electronic technology (87%) and producer manufacturing (13%). The Intellidex employs a rules-based quantitative model screening for growth, value, momentum, and quality factors, with quarterly rebalancing to tilt toward higher-potential semiconductor firms. This smart beta approach offers purer play on chip design, fabrication, and equipment versus broad tech.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The information technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid AI capex boom, with hyperscalers like Microsoft and Meta ramping investments beyond $300 billion annually. Semiconductor sales hit $791 billion in 2025, up 26% year-over-year, eyeing $1 trillion in 2026 driven by logic (40% growth) and memory chips for AI data centers. Capital flows into tech ETFs reached $6 billion in early 2026, shifting from software to infrastructure amid sector rotation. Macro tailwinds include lower interest rates easing growth stock valuations, while risks encompass supply chain tensions, geopolitical chip restrictions, and cyclical downturns. Regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics and antitrust adds caution, yet demand for high-bandwidth memory and custom silicon sustains momentum.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have benefited from tech leadership, with semiconductors outperforming broader IT amid AI infrastructure buildout. PSI's concentrated focus has driven superior returns in semiconductor upswings, outpacing FTEC in strong chip demand phases due to factor tilts amplifying momentum in names like AMD and MU. FTEC, anchored by stable giants like AAPL and MSFT, exhibits lower volatility and steadier performance across rotations. In recent weeks, chip volatility spiked on earnings cycles and CapEx updates, favoring PSI's relative positioning, though FTEC's diversification tempers drawdowns. Both correlate with interest rate expectations and AI adoption trends, but PSI's higher beta suits tactical trades.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like technology and semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PSI for investors seeking higher conviction in semiconductor momentum, given its factor-based selection capturing AI chip tailwinds, stronger trend consistency in recent cycles, and sector momentum despite higher costs and concentration risk. FTEC edges on diversification, efficiency, and lower volatility for broader exposure. Probability tilts toward PSI in the near term amid sustained CapEx flows, but blend both for optimal risk-adjusted positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTEC vs. PSI commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a StrongBuy and PSI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 21B vs. PSI (2.92B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: PSI (133.917) vs FTEC (28.310). FTEC was incepted earlier than PSI: FTEC (13 years) vs PSI (21 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56). PSI has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
FTECPSIFTEC / PSI
Gain YTD28.310133.91721%
Net Assets21B2.92B719%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.5615%
Turnover9.0078.0012%
Yield0.330.05685%
Fund Existence13 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTECPSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWDL62.852.85
+4.75%
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Fctr TR ETN
MLPI55.100.83
+1.53%
NEOS MLP & Engy Infras Hi Inc ETF
GQI58.68-0.04
-0.07%
Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF
FSTA52.05-0.36
-0.69%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
SAWG23.79-0.17
-0.72%
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Lg Cp Qual Gr ETF

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
+0.40%
NVDA - FTEC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
LRCX - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
AVGO - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
CEVA - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
KLAC - FTEC
67%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
More

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
+3.50%
LRCX - PSI
86%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
+4.36%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
AMAT - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
KLAC - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
More