In the current market environment dominated by artificial intelligence advancements and digital infrastructure expansion, comparing FTEC and SOXX highlights key choices for technology sector exposure. FTEC delivers comprehensive coverage of the U.S. information technology sector, encompassing software, hardware, and services. SOXX, by contrast, targets the high-growth semiconductor subsector, providing alternative exposure within technology. These ETFs appeal to investors seeking either diversified tech participation or concentrated bets on chipmakers fueling AI and data centers. As capital flows intensify into semiconductors amid earnings cycles and interest rate dynamics, this ETF comparison aids in evaluating structural differences, risk profiles, and relative positioning for long-term portfolios.
The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. equities in the information technology sector per GICS classification. Launched in 2013, it holds approximately 289 stocks with top 10 holdings comprising about 57% of assets, including NVDA (17.24%), AAPL (15.04%), MSFT (10.28%), AVGO (4.27%), and MU (2.42%). Sector allocation is overwhelmingly information technology at nearly 100%, with minor exposures to industrials and communication services.
FTEC features an ultralow expense ratio of 0.084% and employs a representative sampling strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index securities. It rebalances quarterly, maintaining market-cap weighting with 25/50 concentration limits. With strong liquidity and AUM exceeding $15 billion, FTEC suits investors pursuing broad, cost-effective tech sector exposure across subindustries like software, semiconductors, and IT services.
The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) is a passive ETF tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index, focusing on 30 U.S.-listed companies in the semiconductor sector. Inception in 2001, it maintains a concentrated portfolio where top 10 holdings account for over 56% of assets, led by MU (9.03%), NVDA (7.40%), AMAT (7.04%), AMD (6.50%), and AVGO (5.96%). Allocation breaks down to semiconductors (72.62%) and semiconductor equipment (27.22%).
With an expense ratio of 0.34%, SOXX uses modified market-cap weighting, capping the top five holdings at 8% and others at 4%. It rebalances quarterly and annually reconstitutes, ensuring focus on float-adjusted leaders meeting liquidity thresholds. AUM surpasses $20 billion, supporting high liquidity for investors targeting the cyclical semiconductor value chain, from design to manufacturing equipment.
The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid surging AI infrastructure demand, data center expansions, and digital transformation. Global semiconductor sales hit record highs in recent quarters, propelled by logic and memory chips essential for generative AI models. Capital flows favor chipmakers as hyperscalers like cloud providers ramp investments, though cyclical risks persist from inventory cycles and end-market demand in PCs, autos, and industrials. Macro drivers include moderating interest rates supporting growth stocks, alongside geopolitical tensions over supply chains and U.S.-China trade restrictions. Regulatory pushes for domestic fabrication bolster U.S.-listed firms, while sector risks encompass overcapacity and competition in AI chips. This environment amplifies semiconductor momentum but underscores the value of broader tech diversification.
In recent months through early 2026, SOXX has outperformed FTEC, driven by robust earnings from AI chip leaders like NVDA and memory plays amid data center booms. Over the past year, SOXX delivered superior returns, reflecting semiconductor sector rotation fueled by AI hype and capex surges, while FTEC trailed due to softer contributions from software and hardware peripherals. Volatility metrics highlight SOXX's higher beta (around 1.6) and deeper drawdowns in corrections, versus FTEC's more muted profile from diversified holdings like MSFT and AAPL.
Relative positioning favors SOXX in momentum-driven cycles tied to interest rate cuts and commodity trends in rare earths, but FTEC demonstrates resilience during subsector lulls, such as non-AI tech rotations. Both benefit from tech's leadership, yet SOXX amplifies upside from earnings beats while exposing investors to greater cyclical swings.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies, and performance metrics like win rate, profit factor, and drawdown. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, adapting dynamically to volatility, trends, and sector shifts. Users can explore bots targeting ETFs, stocks, or patterns, with transparency on backtested and live results. This resource empowers investors to leverage AI-driven signals efficiently. Visit the page to discover leading bots and integrate them into your strategy today.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC for its superior diversification across 289 holdings, ultralow 0.084% expense ratio, and balanced risk exposure amid tech sector rotations. While SOXX captures semiconductor momentum from AI tailwinds, its concentration and higher costs elevate volatility, making FTEC the probabilistic choice for consistent trend alignment and structural efficiency over multi-month horizons.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FTEC | SOXX | FTEC / SOXX | |
| Gain YTD | 28.310 | 100.581 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 21.1B | 47B | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.34 | 25% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 27.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.29 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| FTEC | SOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| NVDA - FTEC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 70% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| AVGO - FTEC | 70% Closely correlated | -4.52% | ||
| CEVA - FTEC | 69% Closely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| KLAC - FTEC | 67% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||