Advertisement
FUL vs NGVT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? H.B. Fuller (FUL) vs. Ingevity (NGVT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Divergent momentum: NGVT has delivered strong relative performance over the past year, while FUL has lagged despite improving fundamentals.
- Business models differ sharply: FUL is a diversified adhesives and sealants maker, while NGVT is a specialty materials company focused on activated carbon and engineered polymers.
- Margin profile: NGVT's adjusted EBITDA margin (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached the mid-30% range, versus roughly 20% for FUL.
- Income vs. growth: FUL pays a dividend (recently raised), whereas NGVT returns capital primarily through share repurchases and pays no dividend.
- Both are in transition: FUL is executing a restructuring program and fending off unsolicited acquisition interest, while NGVT is divesting non-core assets to sharpen its portfolio.
Introduction
Investors comparing FUL and NGVT are weighing two very different specialty chemicals businesses. H.B. Fuller is a global adhesives and sealants leader with broad end-market diversification, while Ingevity is a more concentrated specialty materials company that has spent recent quarters reshaping its portfolio. Both operate in the materials sector, yet their market positioning, growth drivers, and stock price behavior have diverged meaningfully. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders evaluating relative performance, income versus capital appreciation, and how restructuring and portfolio changes are being priced by the market. Understanding these contrasts can clarify which profile better suits a given strategy in the current environment.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
FUL (H.B. Fuller) is the world's largest pure-play adhesives company, founded in 1887 and operating across three segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives; Engineering Adhesives; and Building Adhesive Solutions. The company serves more than 30 market segments across roughly 150 countries.
In recent weeks, FUL has demonstrated solid operational execution even as its share price has faced pressure. The company's most recent quarterly results showed revenue growth in the mid-single digits, driven largely by pricing actions that more than offset lower volumes. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded toward 20%, supported by a multi-year restructuring program known as Project Quantum Leap, which targets meaningful conversion-cost savings through manufacturing consolidation. Management has also navigated elevated raw-material costs and petrochemical supply-chain disruptions.
Sentiment has been mixed. On one hand, FUL has drawn unsolicited acquisition interest for its Building Adhesive Solutions segment, which the board has rejected as undervalued. On the other hand, the stock has underperformed over the trailing year, and some analysts have trimmed price targets or downgraded ratings amid concerns about volumes and demand volatility in end markets such as packaging, electronics, and construction. The shares remain down from their 52-week high, reflecting cautious positioning despite improving profitability.
NGVT Overview and Recent Performance
NGVT (Ingevity) is a global specialty materials company headquartered in North Charleston, South Carolina. Its portfolio centers on activated carbon technologies for emissions control and filtration, high-performance pavement systems, and specialty polymers for coatings and industrial applications.
NGVT has been undergoing an aggressive portfolio transformation. In recent months, the company completed the divestiture of its Industrial Specialties product line and its Road Markings business, sharpening its focus on higher-margin segments. These moves, combined with pricing actions and favorable product mix, have driven notable improvement in profitability. The company's most recent quarterly results featured adjusted earnings growth in the double digits and adjusted EBITDA margin in the mid-30% range, prompting management to raise full-year guidance.
This execution has translated into strong relative performance, with NGVT shares posting substantial gains over the past year and outperforming the broader chemicals industry. Growth has been supported by a shift in consumer preference toward hybrid vehicles, which sustains demand for its gasoline vapor emission control activated carbon, as well as early commercial progress in areas such as PFAS water filtration. Unlike FUL, NGVT pays no dividend, returning capital through share repurchases while prioritizing debt reduction.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates a marketplace of hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered securities. Because no single bot suits every market environment, Tickeron curates a dedicated Trending AI Robots section to highlight only the most suitable performers for current conditions. These featured bots span styles ranging from swing trading and day trading to longer-horizon trend following, with published statistics on win rates, trade frequency, and historical performance that allow users to compare approaches at a glance. Whether you are evaluating FUL, NGVT, or a broader watchlist, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify an automated strategy aligned with your own timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both companies operate in specialty materials, their profiles diverge across several dimensions. FUL offers diversification across hygiene, engineering, and construction adhesives, providing steadier, more defensive revenue streams and a dividend yield near 2%. NGVT is more concentrated, with a heavier reliance on automotive-related activated carbon demand and infrastructure spending, which makes its earnings more cyclical and its shares more volatile (reflected in a higher beta, a measure of sensitivity to market swings).
On profitability, NGVT currently holds the edge, with adjusted EBITDA margins in the mid-30% range compared with FUL's roughly 20%. However, FUL is generating consistent revenue growth and margin expansion through pricing and restructuring, while NGVT's recent top-line comparisons are complicated by divestitures. Growth drivers also differ: FUL leans on pricing execution and cost savings, while NGVT benefits from hybrid-vehicle adoption trends and portfolio realignment.
Risk factors contrast as well. FUL faces demand softness in packaging, electronics, and construction, plus elevated raw-material costs. NGVT carries exposure to a cyclical automotive market and still-elevated leverage as it works toward its target range. In market positioning terms, NGVT has been the momentum leader, while FUL has been the value-and-income alternative.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor NGVT in the current environment. The stock exhibits stronger trend consistency and relative performance, supported by rising guidance, margin expansion, and a successful portfolio transformation. Its higher momentum aligns more closely with the trend-following signals that many AI trading bots prioritize. That said, the preference is probabilistic rather than definitive: NGVT's higher volatility and cyclical exposure introduce greater risk, while FUL offers comparatively lower volatility and a dividend, which may appeal to stability-oriented models. The relative positioning between the two stocks could shift as earnings, catalysts, and market sentiment evolve.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and NGVT is a StrongBuy.
FUL's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for FUL moved out of oversold territory on September 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 19 of the 27 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FUL as a result. In 50 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FUL just turned positive on September 25, 2026. Looking at past instances where FUL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
Following a +0.86% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in 156 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 40 of 57 cases where FUL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FUL entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.307) is normal, around the industry mean (2.351). P/E Ratio (14.874) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.083). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.801) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
NGVT in +1.12% Uptrend, rising for three consecutive days on October 20, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where NGVT advanced for three days, in 213 of 289 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 42 of 57 cases where NGVT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
NGVT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NGVT as a result. In 55 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NGVT turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 40 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 85%.
NGVT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NGVT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The 50-day moving average for NGVT moved below the 200-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NGVT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator for NGVT entered a downward trend on September 24, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NGVT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NGVT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 99 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: NGVT's P/B Ratio (51.750) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.351). P/E Ratio (44.968) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.083). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.530) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.107) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
FUL | NGVT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGVT (99) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's SMR Rating (18) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (87) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | NGVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NGVT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NGVT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGVT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NGVT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while NGVT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
NGVT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.73% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVTX | 8.34 | 0.17 | +2.08% |
| Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX) | |||
| TMFG | 30.78 | 0.24 | +0.79% |
| Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) | |||
| NFTY | 51.86 | 0.39 | +0.75% |
| First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) | |||
| HMAY | 25.48 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF (HMAY) | |||
| FJAN | 56.91 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) | |||
NGVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGVT has been loosely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGVT jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGVT | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| FUL - NGVT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AVNT - NGVT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| MTX - NGVT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| KWR - NGVT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| PPG - NGVT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||