Advertisement
FUL vs NGVT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? H.B. Fuller (FUL) vs. Ingevity (NGVT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Divergent momentum: NGVT has delivered strong relative performance over the past year, while FUL has lagged despite improving fundamentals.
- Business models differ sharply: FUL is a diversified adhesives and sealants maker, while NGVT is a specialty materials company focused on activated carbon and engineered polymers.
- Margin profile: NGVT's adjusted EBITDA margin (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached the mid-30% range, versus roughly 20% for FUL.
- Income vs. growth: FUL pays a dividend (recently raised), whereas NGVT returns capital primarily through share repurchases and pays no dividend.
- Both are in transition: FUL is executing a restructuring program and fending off unsolicited acquisition interest, while NGVT is divesting non-core assets to sharpen its portfolio.
Introduction
Investors comparing FUL and NGVT are weighing two very different specialty chemicals businesses. H.B. Fuller is a global adhesives and sealants leader with broad end-market diversification, while Ingevity is a more concentrated specialty materials company that has spent recent quarters reshaping its portfolio. Both operate in the materials sector, yet their market positioning, growth drivers, and stock price behavior have diverged meaningfully. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders evaluating relative performance, income versus capital appreciation, and how restructuring and portfolio changes are being priced by the market. Understanding these contrasts can clarify which profile better suits a given strategy in the current environment.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
FUL (H.B. Fuller) is the world's largest pure-play adhesives company, founded in 1887 and operating across three segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives; Engineering Adhesives; and Building Adhesive Solutions. The company serves more than 30 market segments across roughly 150 countries.
In recent weeks, FUL has demonstrated solid operational execution even as its share price has faced pressure. The company's most recent quarterly results showed revenue growth in the mid-single digits, driven largely by pricing actions that more than offset lower volumes. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded toward 20%, supported by a multi-year restructuring program known as Project Quantum Leap, which targets meaningful conversion-cost savings through manufacturing consolidation. Management has also navigated elevated raw-material costs and petrochemical supply-chain disruptions.
Sentiment has been mixed. On one hand, FUL has drawn unsolicited acquisition interest for its Building Adhesive Solutions segment, which the board has rejected as undervalued. On the other hand, the stock has underperformed over the trailing year, and some analysts have trimmed price targets or downgraded ratings amid concerns about volumes and demand volatility in end markets such as packaging, electronics, and construction. The shares remain down from their 52-week high, reflecting cautious positioning despite improving profitability.
NGVT Overview and Recent Performance
NGVT (Ingevity) is a global specialty materials company headquartered in North Charleston, South Carolina. Its portfolio centers on activated carbon technologies for emissions control and filtration, high-performance pavement systems, and specialty polymers for coatings and industrial applications.
NGVT has been undergoing an aggressive portfolio transformation. In recent months, the company completed the divestiture of its Industrial Specialties product line and its Road Markings business, sharpening its focus on higher-margin segments. These moves, combined with pricing actions and favorable product mix, have driven notable improvement in profitability. The company's most recent quarterly results featured adjusted earnings growth in the double digits and adjusted EBITDA margin in the mid-30% range, prompting management to raise full-year guidance.
This execution has translated into strong relative performance, with NGVT shares posting substantial gains over the past year and outperforming the broader chemicals industry. Growth has been supported by a shift in consumer preference toward hybrid vehicles, which sustains demand for its gasoline vapor emission control activated carbon, as well as early commercial progress in areas such as PFAS water filtration. Unlike FUL, NGVT pays no dividend, returning capital through share repurchases while prioritizing debt reduction.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates a marketplace of hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered securities. Because no single bot suits every market environment, Tickeron curates a dedicated Trending AI Robots section to highlight only the most suitable performers for current conditions. These featured bots span styles ranging from swing trading and day trading to longer-horizon trend following, with published statistics on win rates, trade frequency, and historical performance that allow users to compare approaches at a glance. Whether you are evaluating FUL, NGVT, or a broader watchlist, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify an automated strategy aligned with your own timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both companies operate in specialty materials, their profiles diverge across several dimensions. FUL offers diversification across hygiene, engineering, and construction adhesives, providing steadier, more defensive revenue streams and a dividend yield near 2%. NGVT is more concentrated, with a heavier reliance on automotive-related activated carbon demand and infrastructure spending, which makes its earnings more cyclical and its shares more volatile (reflected in a higher beta, a measure of sensitivity to market swings).
On profitability, NGVT currently holds the edge, with adjusted EBITDA margins in the mid-30% range compared with FUL's roughly 20%. However, FUL is generating consistent revenue growth and margin expansion through pricing and restructuring, while NGVT's recent top-line comparisons are complicated by divestitures. Growth drivers also differ: FUL leans on pricing execution and cost savings, while NGVT benefits from hybrid-vehicle adoption trends and portfolio realignment.
Risk factors contrast as well. FUL faces demand softness in packaging, electronics, and construction, plus elevated raw-material costs. NGVT carries exposure to a cyclical automotive market and still-elevated leverage as it works toward its target range. In market positioning terms, NGVT has been the momentum leader, while FUL has been the value-and-income alternative.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor NGVT in the current environment. The stock exhibits stronger trend consistency and relative performance, supported by rising guidance, margin expansion, and a successful portfolio transformation. Its higher momentum aligns more closely with the trend-following signals that many AI trading bots prioritize. That said, the preference is probabilistic rather than definitive: NGVT's higher volatility and cyclical exposure introduce greater risk, while FUL offers comparatively lower volatility and a dividend, which may appeal to stability-oriented models. The relative positioning between the two stocks could shift as earnings, catalysts, and market sentiment evolve.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and NGVT is a Hold.
FUL in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026
FUL moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 46 of 65 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FUL as a result. In 54 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +3.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in 149 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 31 of 56 cases where FUL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.289) is normal, around the industry mean (2.284). P/E Ratio (14.665) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.801) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
NGVT sees its 50-day moving average cross bearishly below its 200-day moving average
The 50-day moving average for NGVT moved below the 200-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NGVT as a result. In 49 of 74 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NGVT turned negative on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 40 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
NGVT moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NGVT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NGVT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +6.53% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NGVT advanced for three days, in 214 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
NGVT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. NGVT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 99 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: NGVT's P/B Ratio (44.068) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.284). P/E Ratio (38.293) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.530) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.107) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NGVT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
FUL | NGVT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGVT (99) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as NGVT (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's SMR Rating (18) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as NGVT (61) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (89) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | NGVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 53% | 16 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NGVT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NGVT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGVT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NGVT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while NGVT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -17.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
NGVT is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.13% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 73% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| ASIX - FUL | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||
NGVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGVT has been loosely correlated with MTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGVT jumps, then MTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGVT | 100% | -2.60% | ||
| MTX - NGVT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| FUL - NGVT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| AVNT - NGVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| KWR - NGVT | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| EMN - NGVT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAGS | 25.12 | 0.22 | +0.90% |
| Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) | |||
| WTMF | 38.95 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) | |||
| SYLD | 86.06 | -0.06 | -0.06% |
| Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) | |||
| ENO | 19.25 | -0.09 | -0.49% |
| Entergy New Orleans LLC | |||
| FTWO | 44.85 | -0.52 | -1.15% |
| Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) | |||