Advertisement
FUL vs NGVT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Buy and NGVT is a Buy.
FUL | NGVT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGVT (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew significantly faster than NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as NGVT (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to NGVT’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's SMR Rating (18) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (74) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
NGVT's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUL (91) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that NGVT’s stock grew significantly faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | NGVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 74% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NGVT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NGVT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGVT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NGVT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.47% price change this week, while NGVT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
NGVT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-2.84% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADBU | 20.98 | 1.20 | +6.07% |
| Direxion Daily ADBE Bull 2X ETF (ADBU) | |||
| XQQI | 50.71 | 0.13 | +0.26% |
| NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) | |||
| KMAR | 31.56 | -0.09 | -0.29% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) | |||
| GAM | 63.44 | -0.30 | -0.47% |
| General American Investors Company | |||
| CVMC | 73.00 | -0.45 | -0.61% |
| Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) | |||
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 72% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 68% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ASIX - FUL | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
NGVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGVT has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGVT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGVT | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| AVNT - NGVT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| FUL - NGVT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| MTX - NGVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| PPG - NGVT | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| KWR - NGVT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||