GDX
Price
$97.60
Change
+$2.93 (+3.09%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
30.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGDM
Price
$82.82
Change
+$1.62 (+2.00%)
Updated
Sep 3, 11:40 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
696.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SGDM

GDX vs SGDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide exposure to gold mining equities but differ in geographic scope, with GDX offering broader global diversification and SGDM concentrating on North American issuers.
  • GDX tracks a market-capitalization-weighted index of global gold and silver miners with approximately 49–66 holdings, while SGDM follows a factor-enhanced index emphasizing revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low debt-to-equity ratios with about 49 holdings.
  • SGDM maintains a lower net expense ratio of 0.46% compared to GDX’s 0.51%, potentially improving net returns over time for cost-conscious investors.
  • GDX exhibits greater liquidity and scale as one of the largest gold miners ETFs, whereas SGDM employs quarterly rebalancing to maintain its factor-based selection criteria.
  • Sector allocation for both centers on materials, specifically gold mining, with GDX including more international exposure and SGDM tilting toward larger, financially stronger North American producers.
  • Relative positioning favors SGDM for investors seeking factor-driven selection within the gold miners theme, while GDX suits those prioritizing broad market-cap exposure and trading efficiency.

Introduction

Gold mining equities offer leveraged exposure to gold price movements through operational leverage and production costs. Investors comparing the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) seek alternatives within the same thematic sector rather than direct competitors. Both funds target companies primarily engaged in gold extraction, yet they employ distinct indexing methodologies that produce different risk-return profiles and geographic tilts. This comparison highlights structural distinctions relevant for portfolio construction in precious metals allocation strategies.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index is a modified market-capitalization-weighted benchmark tracking publicly traded companies involved in gold and silver mining worldwide. The fund holds approximately 49–66 securities and maintains a passive, rules-based structure. Top holdings typically include Newmont Corp. (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM), Barrick Mining Corp. (GOLD), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corp. (FNV). Geographic exposure spans Canada, the United States, Australia, Brazil, and South Africa, among others. The net expense ratio stands at 0.51%. As a non-diversified equity ETF focused exclusively on the materials sector, GDX provides broad market-cap representation without active stock selection or leverage.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

The Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) tracks the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index before fees and expenses. This rules-based index selects larger gold companies listed on major U.S. and Canadian exchanges and applies factor weighting based on revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low long-term debt-to-equity ratios. The fund holds approximately 49 issuers and follows a passive strategy with quarterly index reconstitution. Top holdings commonly feature Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM), Newmont Corp. (NEM), Barrick Mining Corp. (GOLD), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corp. (FNV). Geographic concentration centers on Canada and the United States, with smaller allocations to South Africa and the United Kingdom. The net expense ratio is 0.46%. SGDM remains non-diversified and thematic, emphasizing financial quality metrics within the gold miners space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold mining sector operates within the broader materials industry and responds to macroeconomic drivers including central bank gold purchases, monetary policy expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into precious metals equities often accelerate during periods of real yield compression or heightened uncertainty. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards influence operational costs across jurisdictions. Both ETFs face risks from commodity price volatility, currency fluctuations in producer countries, and rising input expenses such as energy and labor. Recent market cycles have highlighted the sector’s sensitivity to interest rate paths and global risk sentiment, with North American producers generally benefiting from stable regulatory environments compared to more diverse international exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected gold price trends and sector rotation dynamics driven by macroeconomic shifts. GDX’s broader global holdings introduce additional volatility from emerging-market currencies and regulatory environments, while SGDM’s factor emphasis on stronger balance sheets and cash-flow metrics may support relative resilience during earnings cycles. Over broader market cycles, SGDM’s quarterly rebalancing and quality tilt have contributed to differentiated behavior versus pure market-cap approaches. Liquidity differences position GDX as the more actively traded vehicle for tactical adjustments, whereas SGDM offers a more targeted North American exposure profile. Relative positioning depends on investor preference for diversification breadth versus factor-driven security selection within the gold miners theme.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like GDX and SGDM may find the tool useful for refining screening criteria aligned with their objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to SGDM. The lower expense ratio, factor-enhanced index methodology emphasizing financial quality, and concentrated North American focus align with efficiency and resilience characteristics in the current thematic environment. GDX remains competitive due to its scale, liquidity, and broader diversification, yet the cost and selection advantages observed in SGDM tilt the probabilistic assessment in its direction for investors prioritizing those attributes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SGDM commentary
Sep 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a StrongBuy and SGDM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 30.5B vs. SGDM (697M). SGDM has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SGDM (16.616) vs GDX (10.377). GDX was incepted earlier than SGDM: GDX (20 years) vs SGDM (12 years). SGDM (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than GDX (0.51). SGDM has a higher turnover GDX (50.00) vs GDX (50.00).
GDXSGDMGDX / SGDM
Gain YTD10.37716.61662%
Net Assets30.5B697M4,376%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.46111%
Turnover50.0059.0085%
Yield0.640.8972%
Fund Existence20 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSGDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZK21.010.13
+0.62%
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
QIS10.14N/A
N/A
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
HELO69.22-0.25
-0.36%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Ldrd Ovrly ETF
THW13.96-0.10
-0.71%
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
EGGY32.03-0.50
-1.54%
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF