GDX
Price
$88.27
Change
-$2.69 (-2.96%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Net Assets
27.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILJ
Price
$29.44
Change
-$0.72 (-2.39%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Net Assets
3.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SILJ

GDX vs SILJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ)

Key Takeaways

  • GDX provides broad exposure to large-cap global gold mining companies, while SILJ targets smaller, higher-risk junior silver mining firms, creating distinct volatility and growth profiles within the precious metals sector.
  • Both ETFs follow passive indexing strategies but differ in focus: GDX tracks a global gold miners index with approximately 60 holdings, whereas SILJ follows a junior silver miners index with roughly 65-70 holdings.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.51% for GDX and 0.69% for SILJ, influencing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking sector exposure.
  • GDX offers greater diversification across established producers with some silver byproducts, while SILJ concentrates on pure-play junior silver explorers and developers, heightening sensitivity to silver price movements and operational risks.
  • Top holdings in GDX emphasize industry leaders such as Newmont Corporation (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD), contrasting with SILJ's focus on names like Hecla Mining Company (HL) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG).
  • Both funds operate as equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the basic materials sector, appealing to investors seeking commodity-linked returns without direct physical metal ownership.

Introduction

Investors comparing precious metals mining exposure often evaluate GDX and SILJ as complementary yet differentiated options within the same thematic universe. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly as identical substitutes; instead, they deliver alternative strategies targeting similar goals of gold and silver sector participation. GDX emphasizes established gold producers on a global scale, while SILJ narrows to smaller silver-focused companies, allowing portfolio builders to balance scale against growth potential based on risk tolerance and commodity views. In the current environment of fluctuating metal prices and macroeconomic uncertainty, understanding their structural distinctions supports more informed allocation decisions.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. This index tracks publicly traded companies primarily engaged in gold mining activities worldwide. The fund typically holds around 60 securities, with top positions concentrated in large-cap producers including Newmont Corporation (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Sector allocation centers almost entirely on basic materials, reflecting its gold-mining mandate with incidental silver exposure from byproduct output. The expense ratio is 0.51%, and the structure remains fully passive with periodic index rebalancing. This design delivers liquid, diversified access to senior gold miners for investors seeking established operational scale and geographic breadth.

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) Overview

The Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) designed to track the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index before fees and expenses. The underlying index focuses on smaller and mid-sized companies actively involved in silver exploration, development, and production. The fund maintains approximately 65-70 holdings, with top allocations typically including Hecla Mining Company (HL), First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG), and other junior operators. Sector exposure resides predominantly in basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.69%. As a thematic passive vehicle, SILJ employs standard index rebalancing to maintain alignment with its junior silver mandate, offering investors targeted exposure to higher-beta names in the silver mining space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a broader commodity and macroeconomic framework influenced by inflation expectations, interest rate trajectories, geopolitical tensions, and industrial demand for silver in electronics and solar applications. Gold mining companies benefit from safe-haven flows during periods of economic or political stress, while silver miners experience amplified moves due to dual monetary and industrial uses. Capital allocation trends favor producers with strong balance sheets and cost discipline, amid ongoing regulatory scrutiny on environmental practices and permitting timelines. Both GDX and SILJ remain sensitive to these drivers, with junior operators facing elevated exploration and development risks compared to established producers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDX has demonstrated relatively more stable behavior tied to large-cap gold producer earnings and dividend sustainability, supporting its role as a core sector holding. SILJ has exhibited greater sensitivity to silver price swings and operational milestones at smaller mines, resulting in higher volatility during commodity rotations. Relative positioning reflects differing beta to underlying metals: GDX benefits from scale and byproduct credits, while SILJ captures leveraged upside from silver-specific catalysts such as supply constraints or industrial demand shifts. Over broader timeframes, these dynamics underscore GDX's emphasis on resilience versus SILJ's orientation toward growth-oriented silver exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the tool to refine your ETF research and uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across established gold miners, and more resilient positioning within the precious metals sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to GDX over SILJ for investors seeking balanced exposure with moderated volatility. SILJ may appeal in scenarios prioritizing silver-specific momentum, though its higher costs and concentrated junior focus introduce comparatively elevated risk characteristics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SILJ commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a StrongBuy and SILJ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 28B vs. SILJ (3.99B). SILJ has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SILJ (6.397) vs GDX (2.915). GDX was incepted earlier than SILJ: GDX (20 years) vs SILJ (14 years). GDX (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than SILJ (0.69). GDX has a higher turnover SILJ (47.00) vs SILJ (47.00).
GDXSILJGDX / SILJ
Gain YTD2.9156.39746%
Net Assets28B3.99B701%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.6974%
Turnover50.0047.00106%
Yield0.852.3037%
Fund Existence20 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSILJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFYF63.670.79
+1.25%
SoFi Social 50 ETF
QQXT103.840.64
+0.62%
First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF
AGZ108.920.37
+0.34%
iShares Agency Bond ETF
LIAU251.94N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF
XME115.27-1.52
-1.30%
Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Mtls &MngETF

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
-2.96%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
WPM - GDX
94%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
PAAS - GDX
92%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
More

SILJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILJ
1D Price
Change %
SILJ100%
-2.39%
PAAS - SILJ
94%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
CDE - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
WPM - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
SKE - SILJ
87%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
OR - SILJ
86%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
More