GFF
Price
$105.97
Change
+$1.09 (+1.04%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMS
Price
$149.23
Change
+$8.70 (+6.19%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.25B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFF vs WMS

GFF vs WMS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFF vs. WMS commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Buy and WMS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GFF: $105.97 vs. WMS: $149.23)
Brand notoriety: GFF and WMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFF: 92% vs. WMS: 140%
Market capitalization -- GFF: $4.8B vs. WMS: $11.25B
GFF [@Building Products] is valued at $4.8B. WMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $11.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $105.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMS is a better buy in the long-term than GFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WMS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMS is a better buy in the short-term than GFF.

Price Growth

GFF (@Building Products) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while WMS (@Building Products) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

WMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-2.15% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMS($11.3B) has a higher market cap than GFF($4.8B). WMS has higher P/E ratio than GFF: WMS (25.43) vs GFF (22.12). GFF YTD gains are higher at: 44.614 vs. WMS (3.295). WMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 870M vs. GFF (275M). WMS has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. GFF (110M). GFF has less debt than WMS: GFF (1.48B) vs WMS (1.79B). WMS has higher revenues than GFF: WMS (3.05B) vs GFF (2.53B).
GFFWMSGFF / WMS
Capitalization4.8B11.3B42%
EBITDA275M870M32%
Gain YTD44.6143.2951,354%
P/E Ratio22.1225.4387%
Revenue2.53B3.05B83%
Total Cash110M223M49%
Total Debt1.48B1.79B82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFF vs WMS: Fundamental Ratings
GFF
WMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
872
SMR RATING
1..100
8641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMS's Valuation (65) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as GFF (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMS (72) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMS’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's SMR Rating (41) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (86) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WMS (61) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to WMS’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFFWMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIXL39.980.34
+0.85%
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Eq Strat ETF
NTSE46.610.29
+0.63%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF
AFLG45.340.28
+0.62%
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
DFAU53.850.32
+0.60%
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
FLAO28.54N/A
N/A
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Flr5 Apr/Oct ETF

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been closely correlated with OC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then OC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
+1.04%
OC - GFF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
BLDR - GFF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
WMS - GFF
67%
Closely correlated
+6.19%
CSL - GFF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
MAS - GFF
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More