GFF
Price
$91.56
Change
+$2.65 (+2.98%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.08B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMS
Price
$142.28
Change
+$1.81 (+1.29%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.76B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFF vs WMS

GFF vs WMS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFF vs. WMS commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a StrongBuy and WMS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (GFF: $88.91 vs. WMS: $140.46)
Brand notoriety: GFF and WMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFF: 76% vs. WMS: 60%
Market capitalization -- GFF: $4.08B vs. WMS: $10.76B
GFF [@Building Products] is valued at $4.08B. WMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $104.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMS is a better buy in the long-term than GFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMS is a better buy in the short-term than GFF.

Price Growth

GFF (@Building Products) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while WMS (@Building Products) price change was -7.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

WMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-2.36% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMS($10.8B) has a higher market cap than GFF($4.08B). GFF has higher P/E ratio than WMS: GFF (87.17) vs WMS (25.77). GFF YTD gains are higher at: 21.333 vs. WMS (-2.776). WMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 870M vs. GFF (275M). WMS has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. GFF (110M). GFF has less debt than WMS: GFF (1.48B) vs WMS (1.79B). WMS has higher revenues than GFF: WMS (3.05B) vs GFF (2.53B).
GFFWMSGFF / WMS
Capitalization4.08B10.8B38%
EBITDA275M870M32%
Gain YTD21.333-2.776-769%
P/E Ratio87.1725.77338%
Revenue2.53B3.05B83%
Total Cash110M223M49%
Total Debt1.48B1.79B82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFF vs WMS: Fundamental Ratings
GFF
WMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
799
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1575
SMR RATING
1..100
8740
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
326
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMS's Valuation (55) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as GFF (84) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMS (75) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMS’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's SMR Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (87) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WMS (56) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to WMS’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WMS (26) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to WMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFFWMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBANZ19.83N/A
N/A
Huntington Bancshares Inc
BXC57.40-0.51
-0.88%
BlueLinx Holdings
GEG2.15-0.02
-0.92%
Great Elm Group
HIMX13.27-0.35
-2.57%
Himax Technologies
COKE178.44-5.92
-3.21%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
-0.85%
BLDR - GFF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
MAS - GFF
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
LPX - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CSL - GFF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
NX - GFF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
More

WMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMS
1D Price
Change %
WMS100%
-0.91%
BLDR - WMS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
LII - WMS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
MAS - WMS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
OC - WMS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
GFF - WMS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
More