GFS
Price
$83.37
Change
-$6.30 (-7.03%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
45.76B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICHR
Price
$92.20
Change
-$7.41 (-7.44%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.21B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs ICHR

GFS vs ICHR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? GlobalFoundries (GFS) vs. Ichor Holdings (ICHR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ICHR has dramatically outperformed GFS in recent market activity, with year-to-date gains exceeding 249% compared to GFS's approximately 86% rise.
  • Both stocks operate in the semiconductor sector, benefiting from AI-driven demand and chip industry recovery, but ICHR focuses on equipment components while GFS is a pure-play foundry.
  • GFS offers greater stability with a $35 billion market cap and positive trailing EPS of $1.59, versus ICHR's smaller $2.2 billion cap and negative TTM EPS.
  • Recent analyst upgrades and momentum favor ICHR, though both face upcoming quarterly earnings that could influence near-term trajectories.
  • Semiconductor exposure positions both for growth, but ICHR's volatility reflects higher risk-reward potential.

Introduction

In the surging semiconductor sector, GFS and ICHR represent distinct opportunities for traders and investors tracking chip industry momentum. GlobalFoundries (GFS), a leading semiconductor foundry, contrasts with Ichor Holdings (ICHR), a specialist in fluid delivery systems for chip manufacturing equipment. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid broader sector tailwinds like AI infrastructure and automotive recovery. Day traders may eye short-term volatility, while long-term investors assess growth sustainability and risk profiles in a cyclical industry.

GFS Overview and Recent Performance

GlobalFoundries (GFS) is a premier semiconductor foundry manufacturing wafers for microprocessors, baseband processors, and power management units, serving markets like smartphones, data centers, automotive, and defense. With facilities in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, it emphasizes mature process nodes amid supply chain shifts.

In recent market activity, GFS shares have climbed near their 52-week highs around $65, posting year-to-date gains of about 86% and monthly advances over 40%. This momentum stems from sector recovery, particularly in aerospace, automotive, and defense segments, alongside expectations for modest Q1 revenue growth to $1.62 billion. Positive EPS of $0.55 in the prior quarter and a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 40.82 reflect improving profitability, though analysts maintain a neutral-to-buy stance with targets around $52. Sentiment has brightened on broad market recoveries, tempered by upcoming earnings scrutiny.

ICHR Overview and Recent Performance

Ichor Holdings (ICHR) designs and manufactures critical fluid delivery subsystems, gas and chemical components for semiconductor capital equipment, supporting etch, deposition, and cleaning processes. It supplies original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the chip fabrication ecosystem, with operations centered in California.

ICHR has delivered explosive performance, surging over 249% year-to-date from 52-week lows near $13 to highs above $72, amid the chip boom. Recent weeks saw sharp gains, with shares trading around $64-65 and analyst upgrades like Stifel's shift to Buy. Momentum builds on industry tailwinds, including AI-related demand, despite negative TTM EPS of -$1.54; forward P/E suggests recovery potential. Q1 revenue is projected at $251 million, with EPS at $0.13. Elevated volatility underscores risk, but strong relative strength ratings signal sustained enthusiasm.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase diverse strategies like trend trading, swing trades, and high-win-rate signals on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 163%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors to 11.70, and favorable profit-to-drawdown ratios. Many target hot sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD, TSM), data centers, and AI infrastructure, adapting to volatile conditions with risk management. Explore these curated bots to identify those aligning with your style and enhance trading efficiency.

Head-to-Head Comparison

GFS and ICHR share semiconductor exposure but diverge in business models: GFS as a foundry directly fabricates chips, while ICHR supplies subsystems to equipment makers, linking it closely to capital spending cycles. Growth drivers favor ICHR's leverage to equipment demand surges, evidenced by 225% one-year returns versus GFS's 83%, though GFS boasts steadier revenue from diversified end-markets.

Recent momentum tilts to ICHR's outsized gains and upgrades, contrasting GFS's consistent climb. Risk factors highlight ICHR's higher volatility (52-week range triples GFS's percentage span) and negative earnings, against GFS's profitability and scale. Sector tailwinds like AI and autos benefit both, but ICHR's positioning amplifies upside trade-offs in a frothy market, while GFS offers defensive maturity. Sentiment leans bullish for ICHR on momentum, with GFS anchored by fundamentals.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI analysis currently leans toward ICHR over GFS, driven by superior trend consistency, explosive relative performance, and positive analyst momentum in recent weeks. ICHR's alignment with chip equipment demand provides nearer-term catalysts, though GFS's stability and profitability position it well for sustained recovery. This probabilistic edge favors momentum plays but warrants monitoring post-earnings shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
GFS vs. ICHR commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and ICHR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (GFS: $89.67 vs. ICHR: $99.67)
Brand notoriety: GFS and ICHR are both not notable
GFS represents the Semiconductors, while ICHR is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 72% vs. ICHR: 108%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $49.2B vs. ICHR: $3.48B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $49.2B. ICHR’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $3.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.05T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $732.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $205.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $80.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICHR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICHR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICHR is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICHR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ICHR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICHR is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.78% price change this week, while ICHR (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +11.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

ICHR is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.05% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.28% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($45.8B) has a higher market cap than ICHR($3.21B). ICHR YTD gains are higher at: 440.803 vs. GFS (156.787). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. ICHR (-4.83M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.07B vs. ICHR (89.1M). ICHR has less debt than GFS: ICHR (159M) vs GFS (1.72B). GFS has higher revenues than ICHR: GFS (6.84B) vs ICHR (959M).
GFSICHRGFS / ICHR
Capitalization45.8B3.21B1,426%
EBITDA2.26B-4.83M-46,853%
Gain YTD156.787440.80336%
P/E Ratio51.10N/A-
Revenue6.84B959M713%
Total Cash3.07B89.1M3,447%
Total Debt1.72B159M1,084%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICHR: Fundamental Ratings
ICHR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSICHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICHR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMTM54.350.60
+1.12%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
MARW36.070.02
+0.04%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF
IBMR25.370.01
+0.02%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF
CPNQ27.370.01
+0.02%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec
SBU19.05-0.28
-1.42%
Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+4.47%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
+4.75%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
+5.27%
VECO - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
More

ICHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICHR has been closely correlated with UCTT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICHR jumps, then UCTT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICHR
1D Price
Change %
ICHR100%
+1.07%
UCTT - ICHR
73%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
KLIC - ICHR
70%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
GFS - ICHR
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.47%
IPGP - ICHR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
COHU - ICHR
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More