GGLDF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
19.24M
KGC
Price
$15.43
Change
-$0.13 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs KGC

Header iconGGLDF vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs KGCBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$143.4K
Capitalization19.24M
Kinross Gold
Price$15.43
Change-$0.13 (-0.84%)
Volume$13.43M
Capitalization7.52B
GGLDF vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. KGC commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a StrongBuy and KGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.20 vs. KGC: $15.43)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 193% vs. KGC: 70%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $19.24M vs. KGC: $7.52B
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.24M. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +17.01% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than GGLDF($19.2M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 101.026 vs. KGC (67.240). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. GGLDF (-6.98M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. GGLDF (841K). GGLDF has less debt than KGC: GGLDF (90K) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than GGLDF: KGC (4.24B) vs GGLDF (0).
GGLDFKGCGGLDF / KGC
Capitalization19.2M7.52B0%
EBITDA-6.98M1.76B-0%
Gain YTD101.02667.240150%
P/E RatioN/A18.12-
Revenue04.24B-
Total Cash841K352M0%
Total Debt90K2.26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9527
SMR RATING
1..100
10049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10089
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (87) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (95) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (42) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEUFX59.550.38
+0.64%
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
MOSAX9.49N/A
N/A
MassMutual Overseas A
SWMIX23.58N/A
N/A
Schwab International Opportunities
DPREX12.70N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets A
JSEZX38.97N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R2

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+4.20%
CALRF - GGLDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GAU - GGLDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
THM - GGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
PAAS - GGLDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
KGC - GGLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More