GOLF
Price
$98.16
Change
-$1.28 (-1.29%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.75B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAS
Price
$83.90
Change
+$0.13 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
11.87B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOLF vs HAS

Header iconGOLF vs HAS Comparison
Open Charts GOLF vs HASBanner chart's image
GOLF vs HAS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Acushnet Holdings Corp (GOLF) vs. Hasbro Inc (HAS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Revenue Growth: GOLF posted modest 5% YoY revenue growth driven by premium golf ball sales, while HAS saw 3% YoY growth anchored by its board‑game and entertainment franchises.
  • Profitability: GOLF’s trailing EPS (Earnings Per Share) rose 12% versus HAS’s 4% increase, reflecting higher margins on high‑priced equipment.
  • Valuation: GOLF trades around a 21× PE (Price‑to‑Earnings) ratio, below the Consumer Discretionary average; HAS trades near 23×, slightly above sector peers.
  • Dividend Yield: GOLF offers about 1.5% yield, HAS about 2.6%, appealing to income‑focused traders.
  • Risk Profile: GOLF is more exposed to discretionary spending cycles in golf, whereas HAS faces product‑cycle volatility in the toy sector and regulatory scrutiny of digital gaming.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to consumer discretionary themes often compare Acushnet Holdings Corp (GOLF), the premier maker of Titleist golf equipment, with Hasbro Inc (HAS), a global leader in toys, board games, and digital entertainment. This comparison is relevant for traders who balance growth‑oriented positions against defensive dividend play, as both companies occupy distinct niches yet share exposure to consumer confidence, supply‑chain dynamics, and seasonality.

GOLF Overview and Recent Performance

Acushnet Holdings Corp designs, manufactures, and markets premium golf products under the Titleist, FootJoy, Vokey Design, and Scotty Cameron brands. Recent weeks have seen the stock rebound from a 5% dip earlier in the quarter, driven by solid Q1 earnings that beat analyst expectations on revenue of $2.45 billion and EPS of $2.93. The beat was attributed to strong demand for Titleist Pro V1 golf balls and a successful rollout of a new Vokey wedge line. Management also highlighted a modest price‑increase strategy that lifted average selling prices without eroding volume.

Sentiment has been buoyed by an improving seasonal outlook—golf participation typically spikes in the spring and summer—while macro‑level concerns such as higher tariffs on imported sporting‑goods have been partially offset by a favorable foreign‑exchange environment for U.S. exports. The company’s forward dividend of $0.215 per share (≈1.5% yield) and a payout ratio near 30% reinforce its attractiveness to dividend‑seeking investors.

HAS Overview and Recent Performance

Hasbro Inc is a diversified entertainment company best known for brands like Monopoly, Transformers, and the digital gaming platform Wizards of the Coast. In the past month the stock has traded within a narrow 2% band, reflecting cautious investor sentiment after the company disclosed slightly lower‑than‑expected Q1 earnings. Revenue reached $5.76 billion, up 3% YoY, while EPS rose 4% to $1.84.

Key drivers included a resurgence in board‑game sales and steady performance from the Nerf and Play‑Doh! lines. However, the company noted a temporary slowdown in its digital gaming segment due to competitive pressure from mobile‑first publishers. Hasbro’s dividend, currently $1.60 (≈2.6% yield), remains unchanged, and the payout ratio sits around 45%, indicating a sustainable income stream but leaving less room for aggressive reinvestment.

Trending AI Robots

The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases a curated set of artificial‑intelligence trading bots that have demonstrated consistent outperformance across thousands of tickers. Tickeron maintains hundreds of autonomous bots, each employing distinct strategies (e.g., momentum, mean‑reversion, multi‑timeframe) and risk parameters. Only the top‑ranked bots—typically those delivering a Sharpe ratio above 1.5 and a win‑rate exceeding 55%—appear in the Trending segment, ensuring they are well‑suited to current market conditions. Traders can explore individual bot statistics, back‑tested performance, and live‑trade alerts before deciding which algorithms align with their risk tolerance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: GOLF relies on high‑margin premium equipment, a relatively concentrated product line, and a strong brand loyalty among serious golfers. HAS operates a broad portfolio spanning physical toys, licensed entertainment, and digital gaming, offering diversification but also exposure to varying consumer trends.
  • Growth Drivers: GOLF’s growth is tied to equipment innovation, incremental price increases, and expansion in emerging golf markets (Asia‑Pacific). HAS’s growth comes from licensing deals, new franchise launches, and digital‑gaming subscriptions.
  • Recent Momentum: GOLF has shown a steadier upward price trend in recent weeks, while HAS has been more range‑bound with occasional dips linked to earnings revisions.
  • Risk Factors: GOLF faces seasonality and sensitivity to discretionary spending on luxury sports goods. HAS confronts product‑cycle risk, competitive pressures in digital gaming, and regulatory scrutiny over data privacy in its online platforms.
  • Sector Exposure: Both belong to Consumer Discretionary, yet GOLF is classified under Leisure & Recreation Products, whereas HAS sits in Toys & Games. These sub‑sectors have historically responded differently to macro‑economic shifts.
  • Market Sentiment: Analyst coverage for GOLF leans “Buy” (average rating 2.4), while HAS averages “Hold” (rating 2.0), reflecting a more cautious outlook for the toy segment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors—trend consistency, earnings stability, dividend yield, and relative valuation—Tickeron’s AI presently leans toward GOLF. The AI observes a clearer upward price trajectory, stronger EPS growth, and a more attractive PE relative to sector peers. Nonetheless, the recommendation is probabilistic (≈60% confidence) rather than definitive, and a shift in consumer sentiment or a mid‑year product launch at HAS could quickly alter the balance.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GOLF vs. HAS commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLF is a StrongBuy and HAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (GOLF: $98.16 vs. HAS: $83.90)
Brand notoriety: GOLF and HAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLF: 112% vs. HAS: 55%
Market capitalization -- GOLF: $5.75B vs. HAS: $11.87B
GOLF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $5.75B. HAS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $11.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOLF is a better buy in the long-term than HAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOLF is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

GOLF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +9.07% price change this week, while HAS (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +6.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

HAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+6.28% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($11.9B) has a higher market cap than GOLF($5.75B). GOLF has higher P/E ratio than HAS: GOLF (34.44) vs HAS (25.60). GOLF YTD gains are higher at: 23.654 vs. HAS (3.866). GOLF (337M) and HAS (329M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . HAS has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. GOLF (51.7M). GOLF has less debt than HAS: GOLF (1.15B) vs HAS (3.62B). HAS has higher revenues than GOLF: HAS (4.81B) vs GOLF (2.61B).
GOLFHASGOLF / HAS
Capitalization5.75B11.9B48%
EBITDA337M329M102%
Gain YTD23.6543.866612%
P/E Ratio34.4425.60135%
Revenue2.61B4.81B54%
Total Cash51.7M1.36B4%
Total Debt1.15B3.62B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLF vs HAS: Fundamental Ratings
GOLF
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
277
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1691
SMR RATING
1..100
4497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8537

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAS (91) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that GOLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HAS (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that GOLF’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (50) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLFHAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROMA7.760.71
+10.14%
Roma Green Finance Limited
JEF61.662.00
+3.35%
Jefferies Financial Group
CHSCN25.150.12
+0.48%
CHS
IMAX42.240.12
+0.28%
Imax Corp
GPUS0.15-0.01
-8.03%
Hyperscale Data Inc

GOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOLF has been loosely correlated with CALY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOLF jumps, then CALY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOLF
1D Price
Change %
GOLF100%
-1.29%
CALY - GOLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.51%
YETI - GOLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
JAKK - GOLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
AS - GOLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
JOUT - GOLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
More

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with JOUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then JOUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+0.16%
JOUT - HAS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
YETI - HAS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
GOLF - HAS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
AS - HAS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
MAT - HAS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More