MGA
Price
$64.55
Change
+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.31B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNRO
Price
$14.18
Change
+$0.16 (+1.14%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
418.94M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGA vs MNRO

MGA vs MNRO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGA vs. MNRO commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGA is a Hold and MNRO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGA vs MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
MGA
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRO's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MGA (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MGA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (81) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MNRO (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MNRO (56) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew significantly faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGAMNRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MGA: $64.57 vs. MNRO: $14.18)
Brand notoriety: MGA and MNRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGA: 59% vs. MNRO: 47%
Market capitalization -- MGA: $17.31B vs. MNRO: $418.94M
MGA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $17.31B. MNRO’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $418.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $1.93K to $69.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than MNRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNRO is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

MNRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.33% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

View a ticker or compare two or three
MGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KEEL3.620.18
+5.23%
Keel Infrastructure Corp.
PSKY9.500.16
+1.71%
Paramount Skydance Corporation
FULTP17.20-0.09
-0.52%
Fulton Financial Corp
TRT6.16-0.07
-1.12%
Trio-Tech International
ECX0.86-0.12
-12.40%
ECARX Holdings

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
+0.21%
ALV - MNRO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
GT - MNRO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
LEA - MNRO
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
SMP - MNRO
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
MGA - MNRO
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More