GT
Price
$4.84
Change
-$0.19 (-3.78%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$59.79
Change
-$0.24 (-0.40%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.23B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs PHIN

GT vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. PHIN commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT: Fundamental Ratings
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GT: $5.03 vs. PHIN: $60.03)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. PHIN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 114% vs. PHIN: 133%
Market capitalization -- GT: $1.45B vs. PHIN: $2.23B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.45B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $1.93K to $69.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.38% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

View a ticker or compare two or three
GT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSSC36.190.57
+1.60%
NAPCO Security Technologies
BEEM1.13N/A
N/A
Beam Global
OACC10.75-0.01
-0.09%
Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences
SFM64.48-1.87
-2.82%
Sprouts Farmers Market
VRTX506.74-16.07
-3.07%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
+1.21%
LEA - GT
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
PHIN - GT
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
MNRO - GT
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
GPC - GT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
LKQ - GT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with SMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then SMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+1.01%
SMP - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
LEA - PHIN
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
DORM - PHIN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
LKQ - PHIN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
MGA - PHIN
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More