GT
Price
$6.95
Change
-$0.13 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$73.59
Change
+$0.53 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs PHIN

GT vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. PHIN commentary
Aug 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2026
Stock price -- (GT: $6.95 vs. PHIN: $73.59)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. PHIN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 54% vs. PHIN: 147%
Market capitalization -- GT: $2B vs. PHIN: $2.7B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GT and PHIN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.79% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.7B) has a higher market cap than GT($2B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than GT: PHIN (21.09) vs GT (4.69). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 18.337 vs. GT (-20.662). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 995M vs. PHIN (447M). PHIN has less debt than GT: PHIN (1.04B) vs GT (8.03B). GT has higher revenues than PHIN: GT (17.9B) vs PHIN (3.57B).
GTPHINGT / PHIN
Capitalization2B2.7B74%
EBITDA995M447M223%
Gain YTD-20.66218.337-113%
P/E Ratio4.6921.0922%
Revenue17.9B3.57B502%
Total Cash723MN/A-
Total Debt8.03B1.04B773%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT: Fundamental Ratings
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTA27.140.11
+0.41%
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
NJNK19.990.03
+0.13%
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF
PTEU33.620.04
+0.11%
Pacer Trendpilot™ European ETF
GBHI25.14N/A
N/A
Gabelli High Income ETF
FXD69.97-0.82
-1.15%
First Trust Cnsmr Discret AlphaDEX® ETF

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.73%
LEA - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
-10.72%
MGA - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
DAN - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
DCH - PHIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
THRM - PHIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
More