GWW
Price
$1377.24
Change
+$9.78 (+0.72%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
64.56B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSM
Price
$125.73
Change
-$0.10 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.03B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GWW vs MSM

GWW vs MSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? W.W. Grainger (GWW) vs. MSC Industrial Direct (MSM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • W.W. Grainger (GWW) is a large-cap industrial supply giant with approximately $17.9 billion in annual sales, while MSC Industrial Direct (MSM) is a mid-cap competitor generating roughly $3.9 billion in trailing twelve-month revenue.
  • GWW has delivered more consistent revenue growth in recent quarters, driven by its dual-channel model combining High-Touch Solutions and Endless Assortment segments, whereas MSM has faced demand headwinds but executed a notable turnaround.
  • MSM shares have surged more than 48% year-to-date in 2026, significantly outperforming GWW on a percentage basis, though GWW remains the far larger enterprise by market capitalization.
  • Both companies operate in the maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) distribution space and face similar macroeconomic pressures, including tariff-related inflation and soft industrial demand.
  • GWW offers a stronger track record of margin stability and cash flow generation, while MSM has attracted attention through insider buying and a compelling valuation recovery story.
  • Investors weighing these two stocks must balance GWW's scale and consistency against MSM's potential for continued mean reversion and growth acceleration.

Introduction

Investors monitoring the industrial distribution sector frequently encounter two prominent names: GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) and MSM (MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.). Both companies supply maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) products to businesses across North America, yet they differ markedly in scale, growth trajectory, and market positioning. Grainger commands a market capitalization several times larger than MSC Industrial Direct, but recent stock performance tells a more nuanced story. This comparison is relevant for investors seeking exposure to industrial distribution, those evaluating relative value within the sector, and traders monitoring momentum shifts between large-cap and mid-cap industrial names.

GWW Overview and Recent Performance

W.W. Grainger is one of the world's largest broad-line MRO distributors, serving over 4.5 million customers through its High-Touch Solutions segment in North America and its Endless Assortment segment, which includes the Zoro and MonotaRO online platforms. The company offers more than 2 million MRO products through its high-touch channel and over 30 million products through digital channels. In its most recently reported full fiscal year, Grainger generated sales of $17.9 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 4.5%, or 4.9% on a daily, organic constant currency basis. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $39.48, up 1.3% from the prior year.

In recent months, Grainger has navigated a challenging macroeconomic backdrop that includes shifting tariff dynamics, uneven industrial demand, and cost inflation. The company's Endless Assortment segment has been a standout, posting double-digit sales growth as digital procurement continues gaining traction among B2B (business-to-business) buyers. Management has also invested aggressively in technology, adding over 85,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) to its High-Touch segment — the largest net SKU expansion in nearly a decade. Grainger's return on invested capital (ROIC) remains exceptional at approximately 39%, and the company returned $1.5 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in its most recent fiscal year. Looking ahead, Grainger has issued guidance calling for further revenue growth and operating margin expansion, underpinned by pricing actions, supply chain efficiencies, and continued digital adoption.

MSM Overview and Recent Performance

MSC Industrial Direct is a leading North American distributor of metalworking and MRO products, offering approximately 1.9 million SKUs through its branch network, e-commerce platform, and inventory management solutions. The company serves a diverse customer base ranging from individual machine shops to Fortune 1000 manufacturers and government agencies. In its most recent fiscal periods, MSC has contended with soft industrial demand, reporting year-over-year revenue declines in certain quarters. However, the company's performance began improving meaningfully in the second half of calendar 2025, with a return to growth in its core customer base and better-than-expected quarterly earnings results.

Recent market activity has been notably positive for MSM. The stock has appreciated more than 48% year-to-date in 2026, reflecting growing investor confidence in the company's turnaround strategy under new leadership. MSC's "Mission Critical" initiatives — focused on productivity improvements, digital upgrades, and core customer re-engagement — have begun to yield measurable results. The company's high-touch solutions, including vending and in-plant programs, now account for nearly 40% of total sales, providing a differentiated value proposition. Insider buying has also drawn attention, with several directors making significant share purchases in late 2025. MSC's gross margin has held relatively steady around 41%, and the company continues to return capital to shareholders through a dividend that it has maintained for 23 consecutive years. With a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio in the low-to-mid 20s and a beta of 0.81, MSM presents a profile of moderate volatility with improving fundamentals.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes and strategies. However, only a subset earns placement in the Trending AI Robots section — those that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market dynamics. These bots employ diverse trading styles, from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following approaches, and each bot features its own track record of performance statistics, win rates, and risk metrics. Whether focused on individual stocks, ETFs (exchange-traded funds), or broader sectors, the showcased bots represent some of the most promising AI-driven strategies available on the platform. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors identify which automated strategies are currently capturing momentum across the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both GWW and MSM operate in the MRO distribution space, their profiles diverge in important ways. Grainger's massive scale — with annual revenue roughly five times that of MSC — provides significant competitive advantages in purchasing power, supply chain density, and brand recognition. Its dual-channel model allows it to serve both complex enterprise customers requiring hands-on service and transactional buyers seeking digital convenience. Grainger's Endless Assortment segment, which grew at a double-digit pace in recent quarters, provides a meaningful growth engine that MSM lacks at comparable scale.

MSC Industrial Direct, by contrast, is a more focused operation with deep expertise in metalworking and a growing portfolio of high-touch solutions. While its revenue base is smaller, MSM's stock has shown greater percentage gains in 2026, reflecting a recovery from lower valuation levels and improving execution. MSM's operating margins, however, remain substantially below Grainger's — MSC's adjusted operating margin has hovered in the mid-to-high single digits, compared to Grainger's 15% range. This margin gap reflects structural differences in business mix and operating leverage.

On the risk front, both companies face exposure to tariff-related cost inflation and cyclical industrial demand. Grainger's geographic diversification — including a significant presence in Japan through MonotaRO — offers some buffer against North America-specific headwinds, whereas MSC is more heavily concentrated in the U.S. market. From a sentiment perspective, GWW benefits from its reputation as a steady compounder with a long track record of shareholder returns, while MSM is increasingly viewed as a turnaround play with room for multiple expansion if its growth initiatives continue gaining traction.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and trend characteristics, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward GWW for investors prioritizing stability, consistent cash flow generation, and scale-driven competitive advantages. Grainger's broader revenue base, higher operating margins, and robust ROIC (return on invested capital) suggest a more resilient business model capable of compounding through economic cycles. That said, MSM may attract greater attention from momentum-oriented AI strategies, given its stronger recent price performance, insider buying signals, and potential for further valuation re-rating as its turnaround efforts mature. The AI's preference would ultimately depend on the strategy employed — a trend-following bot may favor MSM's upward trajectory, while a stability-focused model would likely favor GWW's consistent earnings power. Neither stock is without risk, and the relative attractiveness of each will continue to shift with evolving macroeconomic conditions and company-specific execution.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GWW vs. MSM commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWW is a StrongBuy and MSM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (GWW: $1367.46 vs. MSM: $125.83)
Brand notoriety: GWW and MSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GWW: 82% vs. MSM: 69%
Market capitalization -- GWW: $64.56B vs. MSM: $7.03B
GWW [@Electronics Distributors] is valued at $64.56B. MSM’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $7.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $64.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GWW’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GWW’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSM is a better buy in the long-term than GWW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GWW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GWW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GWW is a better buy in the short-term than MSM.

Price Growth

GWW (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while MSM (@Electronics Distributors) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

GWW is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

MSM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics Distributors (-0.82% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWW($64.6B) has a higher market cap than MSM($7.03B). GWW has higher P/E ratio than MSM: GWW (36.77) vs MSM (30.39). MSM YTD gains are higher at: 53.760 vs. GWW (36.050). GWW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.88B vs. MSM (426M). GWW has more cash in the bank: 695M vs. MSM (74.1M). MSM has less debt than GWW: MSM (555M) vs GWW (2.78B). GWW has higher revenues than MSM: GWW (18.4B) vs MSM (3.91B).
GWWMSMGWW / MSM
Capitalization64.6B7.03B919%
EBITDA2.88B426M677%
Gain YTD36.05053.76067%
P/E Ratio36.7730.39121%
Revenue18.4B3.91B471%
Total Cash695M74.1M938%
Total Debt2.78B555M501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GWW vs MSM: Fundamental Ratings
GWW
MSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
925
SMR RATING
1..100
2153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2127
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSM's Valuation (26) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWW (88). This means that MSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWW’s over the last 12 months.

GWW's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MSM (25). This means that GWW’s stock grew similarly to MSM’s over the last 12 months.

GWW's SMR Rating (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MSM (53). This means that GWW’s stock grew similarly to MSM’s over the last 12 months.

GWW's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MSM (37). This means that GWW’s stock grew similarly to MSM’s over the last 12 months.

GWW's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MSM (27). This means that GWW’s stock grew similarly to MSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GWWMSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GWW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTS4.800.38
+8.60%
Carparts.Com Inc.
RFAMU10.00N/A
N/A
RF Acquisition Corp III
PMTR10.42-0.01
-0.10%
Perimeter Acquisition Corp I
IBRX7.40-0.11
-1.46%
ImmunityBio
APPN21.96-0.68
-3.00%
Appian Corp

GWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWW has been loosely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GWW jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWW
1D Price
Change %
GWW100%
+0.99%
AIT - GWW
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MSM - GWW
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
WSO - GWW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
WCC - GWW
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
BXC - GWW
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More