H
Price
$184.72
Change
-$6.42 (-3.36%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.39B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WH
Price
$77.19
Change
-$1.35 (-1.72%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.78B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

H vs WH

H vs WH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
H vs. WH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is H is a StrongBuy and WH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (H: $184.72 vs. WH: $77.19)
Brand notoriety: H and WH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: H: 95% vs. WH: 74%
Market capitalization -- H: $17.39B vs. WH: $5.78B
H [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $17.39B. WH’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $5.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $95.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

H’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • H’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WH is a better buy in the long-term than H.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

H’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • H’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, H is a better buy in the short-term than WH.

Price Growth

H (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -4.53% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

H is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

WH is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-3.25% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
H($17.4B) has a higher market cap than WH($5.78B). H (31.36) and WH (30.63) have similar P/E ratio . H YTD gains are higher at: 15.420 vs. WH (3.275). H has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 758M vs. WH (475M). WH has more cash in the bank: 749M vs. H (671M). WH has less debt than H: WH (2.65B) vs H (4.51B). H has higher revenues than WH: H (7.13B) vs WH (1.44B).
HWHH / WH
Capitalization17.4B5.78B301%
EBITDA758M475M160%
Gain YTD15.4203.275471%
P/E Ratio31.3630.63102%
Revenue7.13B1.44B495%
Total Cash671M749M90%
Total Debt4.51B2.65B170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
H vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
H
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2983
SMR RATING
1..100
9230
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WH's Valuation (48) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as H (69). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to H’s over the last 12 months.

H's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (83). This means that H’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

WH's SMR Rating (30) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for H (92). This means that WH’s stock grew somewhat faster than H’s over the last 12 months.

H's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (59). This means that H’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

H's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (21). This means that H’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
H
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDV32.270.25
+0.78%
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF
BMN25.580.06
+0.25%
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
FDTS66.00N/A
N/A
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
TSIC25.19-0.02
-0.07%
Truth Social American Icons ETF
BSV77.47-0.13
-0.17%
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF

H and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, H has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if H jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To H
1D Price
Change %
H100%
-3.36%
HLT - H
76%
Closely correlated
-3.88%
IHG - H
66%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
WH - H
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CHH - H
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
ATAT - H
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with CHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then CHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
-1.72%
CHH - WH
68%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
HLT - WH
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.88%
MAR - WH
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
H - WH
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.36%
IHG - WH
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More