Advertisement
HAS vs ISPO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and ISPO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileISPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISPO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ISPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+4.21% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
@Consumer Sundries (+2.67% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| HAS | ISPO | HAS / ISPO | |
| Capitalization | 11.4B | 37M | 30,811% |
| EBITDA | -81.2M | 60.8M | -134% |
| Gain YTD | 48.221 | -10.542 | -457% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.60 | 3.62 | 707% |
| Revenue | 4.25B | 265M | 1,604% |
| Total Cash | 547M | 16.4M | 3,335% |
| Total Debt | 3.35B | 209M | 1,602% |
HAS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HAS | ISPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCC | 16.04 | 0.13 | +0.81% |
| ProShares UltraShort Consumer Disc | |||
| FREL | 27.20 | 0.12 | +0.44% |
| Fidelity MSCI Real Estate ETF | |||
| GLBL | 23.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF | |||
| FLTB | 50.54 | -0.07 | -0.13% |
| Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | |||
| TRND | 32.69 | -0.08 | -0.25% |
| Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | |||
ISPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and HAS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISPO | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| HAS - ISPO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CUK - ISPO | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MAT - ISPO | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| LTH - ISPO | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.54% | ||
| PRKS - ISPO | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||