It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePII’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while PII (@Recreational Products) price change was -3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.
HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
PII is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
HAS | PII | HAS / PII | |
Capitalization | 7.84B | 5.66B | 139% |
EBITDA | -863.2M | 1B | -86% |
Gain YTD | 26.245 | -27.860 | -94% |
P/E Ratio | 75.76 | 11.36 | 667% |
Revenue | 5B | 8.93B | 56% |
Total Cash | 545M | 368M | 148% |
Total Debt | 3.5B | 2.05B | 170% |
HAS | PII | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAS's Valuation (20) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (25). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.
PII's SMR Rating (55) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (94). This means that PII’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (84). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (11). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.
HAS | PII | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago64% | 12 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago56% | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FXA | 63.94 | 0.08 | +0.12% |
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
CDC | 65.42 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
VictoryShares US EQ Inc Enh Vol Wtd ETF | |||
TEMP | 46.53 | -0.29 | -0.62% |
JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF | |||
FNK | 55.45 | -0.36 | -0.65% |
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
CALF | 46.34 | -0.52 | -1.11% |
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with PII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then PII could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HAS | 100% | -1.35% | ||
PII - HAS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
MAT - HAS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
BC - HAS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
MODG - HAS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
LCII - HAS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PII has been closely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PII jumps, then BC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PII | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PII | 100% | -0.57% | ||
BC - PII | 78% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
LCII - PII | 70% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
WGO - PII | 69% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
MBUU - PII | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
THO - PII | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More |