HFFG
Price
$2.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
118.29M
113 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USFD
Price
$71.16
Change
-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Updated
Nov 19, 02:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.9B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFFG vs USFD

Header iconHFFG vs USFD Comparison
Open Charts HFFG vs USFDBanner chart's image
HF Foods Group
Price$2.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization118.29M
US Foods Holding
Price$71.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization15.9B
HFFG vs USFD Comparison Chart in %
HFFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFFG vs. USFD commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFFG is a Hold and USFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HFFG: $2.23 vs. USFD: $71.33)
Brand notoriety: HFFG and USFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFFG: 44% vs. USFD: 67%
Market capitalization -- HFFG: $118.29M vs. USFD: $15.9B
HFFG [@Food Distributors] is valued at $118.29M. USFD’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $15.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $36.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSFD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HFFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USFD is a better buy in the long-term than HFFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USFD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USFD is a better buy in the short-term than HFFG.

Price Growth

HFFG (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USFD (@Food Distributors) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -5.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFFG is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

USFD is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-5.87% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USFD($15.9B) has a higher market cap than HFFG($118M). HFFG has higher P/E ratio than USFD: HFFG (42.75) vs USFD (29.68). USFD YTD gains are higher at: 5.737 vs. HFFG (-30.530). USFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. HFFG (-10.33M). USFD has more cash in the bank: 61M vs. HFFG (15.6M). HFFG has less debt than USFD: HFFG (237M) vs USFD (5.01B). USFD has higher revenues than HFFG: USFD (38.7B) vs HFFG (1.22B).
HFFGUSFDHFFG / USFD
Capitalization118M15.9B1%
EBITDA-10.33M1.49B-1%
Gain YTD-30.5305.737-532%
P/E Ratio42.7529.68144%
Revenue1.22B38.7B3%
Total Cash15.6M61M26%
Total Debt237M5.01B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFFG vs USFD: Fundamental Ratings
HFFG
USFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
268
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
9363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFFG's Valuation (64) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as USFD (66). This means that HFFG’s stock grew similarly to USFD’s over the last 12 months.

USFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFFG (100). This means that USFD’s stock grew significantly faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

USFD's SMR Rating (63) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as HFFG (93). This means that USFD’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

USFD's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as HFFG (87). This means that USFD’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

USFD's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as HFFG (65). This means that USFD’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFFGUSFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USFD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRE24.30N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF
JBK26.21N/A
N/A
Lehman ABS Corp
TLTW23.22-0.04
-0.15%
iShares 20+ Year Trs Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
TRFK65.74-1.03
-1.54%
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
PCM6.01-0.12
-1.96%
PCM Fund

HFFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFFG and CVGW have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFFG and CVGW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFFG
1D Price
Change %
HFFG100%
+0.90%
CVGW - HFFG
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
SYY - HFFG
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
BZLFY - HFFG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
USFD - HFFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
UNFI - HFFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

USFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USFD has been closely correlated with PFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USFD jumps, then PFGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USFD
1D Price
Change %
USFD100%
+0.13%
PFGC - USFD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
CHEF - USFD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SYY - USFD
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
UNFI - USFD
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
ANDE - USFD
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
More