HFWA
Price
$29.73
Change
+$0.18 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBC
Price
$47.23
Change
+$1.34 (+2.92%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
112.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFWA vs SFBC

HFWA vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFWA vs. SFBC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFWA is a Hold and SFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HFWA: $29.73 vs. SFBC: $47.23)
Brand notoriety: HFWA and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFWA: 82% vs. SFBC: 16%
Market capitalization -- HFWA: $1.22B vs. SFBC: $112.45M
HFWA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.22B. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $112.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFWA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBC is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($1.22B) has a higher market cap than SFBC($112M). SFBC (14.54) and HFWA (14.16) have similar P/E ratio . HFWA YTD gains are higher at: 27.996 vs. SFBC (9.313). SFBC has less debt than HFWA: SFBC (21.2M) vs HFWA (42.4M). HFWA has higher revenues than SFBC: HFWA (266M) vs SFBC (39.6M).
HFWASFBCHFWA / SFBC
Capitalization1.22B112M1,086%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.9969.313301%
P/E Ratio14.1614.5497%
Revenue266M39.6M672%
Total Cash52.6MN/A-
Total Debt42.4M21.2M200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFWA vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
HFWA
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6370
SMR RATING
1..100
6179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (42). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (70). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (79). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (46). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (74). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFWASFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEPSX14.190.13
+0.94%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income R5
AGYGX12.700.11
+0.87%
American Century Focused Global Gr Y
AWSHX67.98-0.02
-0.03%
American Funds Washington Mutual A
WAIGX15.67-0.02
-0.13%
Wasatch International Growth Investor
NEJCX6.26-0.02
-0.32%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap C

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
+0.61%
STBA - HFWA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
BUSE - HFWA
84%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
FULT - HFWA
83%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
NBTB - HFWA
83%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
FRME - HFWA
81%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
More