HGBL
Price
$2.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18, 01:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
97.05M
20 days until earnings call
RJF
Price
$160.58
Change
+$1.10 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jul 18, 02:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.84B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGBL vs RJF

Header iconHGBL vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts HGBL vs RJFBanner chart's image
Heritage Global
Price$2.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$208
Capitalization97.05M
Raymond James Financial
Price$160.58
Change+$1.10 (+0.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization26.84B
HGBL vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGBL vs. RJF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGBL is a Hold and RJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HGBL: $2.16 vs. RJF: $159.48)
Brand notoriety: HGBL and RJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGBL: 72% vs. RJF: 90%
Market capitalization -- HGBL: $97.05M vs. RJF: $26.84B
HGBL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $97.05M. RJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGBL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HGBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than HGBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGBL is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.49% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

HGBL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.45% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($26.8B) has a higher market cap than HGBL($97.1M). RJF has higher P/E ratio than HGBL: RJF (16.09) vs HGBL (8.03). HGBL YTD gains are higher at: 16.757 vs. RJF (3.713). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. HGBL (12.3M). HGBL has less debt than RJF: HGBL (9.88M) vs RJF (3.14B). RJF has higher revenues than HGBL: RJF (11.7B) vs HGBL (60.5M).
HGBLRJFHGBL / RJF
Capitalization97.1M26.8B0%
EBITDA14.8MN/A-
Gain YTD16.7573.713451%
P/E Ratio8.0316.0950%
Revenue60.5M11.7B1%
Total Cash12.3M2.61B0%
Total Debt9.88M3.14B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGBL vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
HGBL
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8914
SMR RATING
1..100
799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGBL's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGBL (89) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew significantly faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGBL (79) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew significantly faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HGBL (53) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

HGBL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGBLRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRECF0.370.02
+4.49%
Critical Elements Lithium Corporation
SABOF0.390.01
+2.70%
Sabio Holdings Inc.
XTEPY70.37N/A
N/A
Xtep International Holdings Ltd.
VTTGF341.10N/A
N/A
VAT Group AG
TRPRF15.50N/A
N/A
TC Energy Corp.

HGBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and MS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and MS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGBL
1D Price
Change %
HGBL100%
-0.92%
MS - HGBL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
GS - HGBL
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
SF - HGBL
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
NHMAF - HGBL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVR - HGBL
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+2.13%
SF - RJF
85%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
MS - RJF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
EVR - RJF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
GS - RJF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
PIPR - RJF
74%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
More