Comparing HLI and NDAQ brings together two influential names in global capital markets — one a premier independent investment bank, the other a leading exchange and financial technology provider. While both companies thrive on the health of financial markets, they operate at different points in the value chain. Investors considering these stocks may include those seeking exposure to an M&A recovery through HLI, or those drawn to NDAQ's steady evolution into a subscription-driven data and technology powerhouse. This comparison examines recent performance, business momentum, and how each stock stacks up in the current market environment, informed by observable data and AI-powered analytical frameworks.
HLI, or Houlihan Lokey, is a global independent investment bank headquartered in Los Angeles, with dominant franchises in corporate finance advisory, financial restructuring, and valuation services. The firm has built a reputation as a leading mid-market M&A advisor while also handling large-cap transactions. In recent weeks, Houlihan Lokey's stock has drawn investor attention amid an improving outlook for dealmaking. As central banks signaled greater confidence around inflation, corporate boards showed increased willingness to pursue acquisitions and strategic transactions. This macro shift has historically been a tailwind for advisory-focused firms like HLI.
Recent quarterly reporting showed HLI delivering corporate finance revenues that reflected gradually improving market activity, while its restructuring practice remained a steady contributor given the lingering effects of elevated borrowing costs on certain stressed sectors. The firm also continued expanding its geographic footprint and sector coverage through selective acquisitions and senior hires, reinforcing its competitive position. Analysts have noted that HLI's diversified advisory model — spanning M&A, restructuring, and valuation disputes — provides internal stability across economic cycles. In recent market sessions, HLI shares have traded with moderate positive momentum, reflecting cautious optimism about a sustained M&A recovery heading into the second half of the calendar year.
NDAQ, Nasdaq Inc., has transformed substantially from its origins as a stock exchange operator into a diversified financial technology and data company. Today, NDAQ generates significant revenue from its Solutions segment, which includes market technology platforms sold to other exchanges, anti-financial crime software (through the Verafin acquisition), and index and analytics services. In recent weeks, NDAQ shares have reflected strength in these recurring revenue lines, as investors reward the company's pivot toward stickier, subscription-based earnings.
Recent quarterly results showed continued growth in Solutions revenue, which helped offset more variable trading and listing-related income. Nasdaq's index business has benefited from the global expansion of passive investing, with assets under management (AUM) tied to Nasdaq indexes reaching substantial levels. Additionally, the company has been integrating its recent Adenza acquisition — a provider of regulatory and risk management software — further cementing its identity as a fintech platform rather than a pure exchange. In recent market activity, NDAQ has traded with relatively lower volatility compared to transaction-dependent peers, a characteristic that income-oriented and quality-focused investors have found appealing. The company's disciplined capital allocation, including dividend growth and share repurchases, has also supported sentiment.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from a pool of hundreds. Each bot trades a distinct set of tickers using specialized algorithms that employ varying trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — ranging from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches. Key statistics available on the platform include win/loss ratios, trade frequency, and annualized return figures, with some bots demonstrating win rates above 70% and others generating double-digit annualized returns in back-tested and real-time scenarios. The Trending section spotlights only those bots whose strategies are best suited to the prevailing market environment, making it an efficient discovery tool. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are currently most aligned with market conditions.
When evaluating HLI versus NDAQ, several structural differences stand out. HLI operates a human-capital-intensive advisory model where revenue is closely tied to transaction volumes and restructuring mandates. This makes it more cyclical — strong during M&A booms, but vulnerable during prolonged deal droughts. NDAQ, by contrast, has deliberately reduced its dependence on transaction-based revenue through acquisitions that build a growing base of recurring subscription income. Its anti-financial crime software, market technology contracts, and index licensing fees generate predictable cash flows regardless of trading volumes.
From a growth driver perspective, HLI's near-term catalyst is the widely anticipated M&A recovery, supported by pent-up demand from private equity firms sitting on record levels of dry powder (unallocated capital). NDAQ's growth narrative centers on cross-selling its expanded product suite — including Adenza — to a global client base of banks, exchanges, and regulators. In terms of market sentiment, HLI may appeal to investors with higher risk tolerance seeking torque to a dealmaking upcycle, while NDAQ tends to attract those prioritizing steady compounding, lower volatility, and a growing dividend stream. Sector exposure also differs: HLI is squarely in financial services and investment banking, while NDAQ increasingly overlaps with enterprise software and data services.
Based on observable market data and prevailing trend patterns, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely identify NDAQ as the more consistent performer in the current environment. The company's predominantly recurring revenue model provides steadier trend signals and lower drawdown risk, characteristics that algorithmic systems often favor when market uncertainty persists. Meanwhile, HLI presents a stronger potential upside case should the M&A cycle accelerate meaningfully, but this catalyst remains probabilistic rather than confirmed. Traders with shorter time horizons may find NDAQ's stability attractive, while those willing to tolerate cyclicality for higher upside potential could see HLI as more compelling. The AI analysis emphasizes trend quality and consistency over binary predictions, and in the current data set, NDAQ's smoother trajectory appears to hold the edge.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.51% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.
HLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.21% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| HLI | NDAQ | HLI / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 8.77B | 52.7B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 616M | 3.43B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | -27.334 | -2.371 | 1,153% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.09 | 27.46 | 77% |
| Revenue | 2.52B | 8.74B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 756M | 2.79B | 27% |
| Total Debt | 493M | 9.24B | 5% |
HLI | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLI's Valuation (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (63). This means that HLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLI (64). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLI’s over the last 12 months.
HLI's SMR Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (54). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (76). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (86). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.
| HLI | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||