Houlihan Lokey and Piper Sandler are two prominent independent investment banks that occupy overlapping yet distinct spaces in the financial services landscape. Both serve middle-market and institutional clients with advisory, capital markets, and institutional brokerage services, and both have navigated a complex macroeconomic environment marked by evolving M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, shifting interest rate expectations, and sector-level volatility. For investors evaluating exposure to the investment banking and brokerage sector, the comparison between HLI and PIPR presents a study in scale, specialization, valuation, and risk. This article examines how these two firms compare across recent performance, strategic momentum, and market positioning.
Houlihan Lokey, headquartered in Los Angeles, is a global investment bank with three core advisory segments: Corporate Finance (M&A and capital markets advisory), Financial Restructuring, and Financial and Valuation Advisory. The firm is widely recognized as a leader in mid-cap M&A and is regularly ranked among the top global restructuring advisors. For its fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, HLI reported record revenues of $2.62 billion, a 9.6% increase from the prior year, while adjusted diluted earnings per share rose 20% to $7.56. However, the fourth quarter saw a deceleration, with revenue of $636 million and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $1.63 both coming in below consensus estimates, partly attributed to timing effects in the restructuring segment.
In recent weeks, HLI announced the acquisition of Intrepid Financial Partners, an energy-focused independent investment bank, a move that adds 34 financial professionals and significantly deepens the firm's oil and gas advisory capabilities. The stock has faced headwinds, declining roughly 26% over the past year, and in recent market activity has traded near its 52-week low. Wolfe Research upgraded the stock to Peerperform from Underperform, citing valuation support and improving sponsor activity. The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 16.7% to $0.70 per share, signaling confidence in its cash generation capacity. With approximately $1.36 billion in unrestricted cash and equivalents as of March 2026, HLI maintains a robust balance sheet.
Piper Sandler, headquartered in Minneapolis, operates as a leading investment bank and institutional securities firm. Its business spans advisory services, equity and debt capital markets, institutional brokerage, public finance, fixed income services, and alternative asset management. The firm has been actively broadening its platform: recent weeks saw the appointment of new co-heads of services and industrials investment banking, the formalization of a private equity advisory group, and the expansion of its restructuring practice with the addition of a veteran managing director. The firm also launched a new distressed debt and special asset group, further diversifying its fixed income capabilities.
In its first quarter of 2026, PIPR delivered record first-quarter net revenues of $474 million, up 33% year-over-year. Advisory services generated $251 million, a 16% increase, while corporate financing revenues more than doubled to $73 million, led by a strong healthcare underwriting franchise. The firm returned $171 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases during the quarter and increased its quarterly dividend by 14% to $0.20 per share (adjusted for a 4-for-1 stock split effective March 2026). PIPR has a trailing P/E ratio of approximately 19.2x and a market capitalization near $5.1 billion. The stock has displayed a relatively flat one-year performance, declining roughly 3%, and recently traded near the middle of its 52-week range. Its second quarter 2026 results are scheduled for release on July 30, 2026.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating opportunities like HLI and PIPR, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots spanning thousands of tickers, but only the most consistently effective and contextually relevant bots earn placement in the Trending section. These bots employ a wide range of trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to mean reversion and breakout strategies — across multiple timeframes and statistical profiles. Many featured bots showcase strong risk-adjusted return metrics, with some achieving win rates above 70% and annualized returns that meaningfully outpace benchmark indices. Each bot is fully transparent about its strategy, traded tickers, and historical performance, allowing users to assess alignment with their own objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which automated strategies are currently gaining traction.
While both HLI and PIPR operate in the investment banking sector, their business models reveal meaningful contrasts. HLI is a pure-play advisory firm with no meaningful trading or underwriting exposure, deriving virtually all revenue from fee-based advisory work across M&A, restructuring, and valuations. This gives it a more predictable revenue profile but also ties its fortunes closely to deal flow cycles. PIPR, by contrast, combines advisory services with institutional brokerage, sales and trading, fixed income, and alternative asset management — a more diversified revenue mix that can benefit from market volatility through higher trading volumes, but also exposes the firm to market-sensitive, transaction-based income streams.
On valuation, PIPR appears comparatively less expensive, trading at approximately 19.2x trailing earnings versus HLI's 22.5x. However, HLI compensates with a substantially higher dividend yield — 2.0% against 0.91% — and a lower beta of 0.95 compared to 1.43, making it the more defensive choice in a risk-off environment. HLI's restructuring franchise also provides a counter-cyclical buffer that PIPR's platform does not replicate to the same degree, though PIPR is actively expanding its own restructuring capabilities. In terms of recent momentum, PIPR has shown greater revenue growth acceleration in its latest reported quarter, while HLI has faced earnings misses and a steeper price decline. Conversely, HLI's Intrepid acquisition and its entrenched position in global M&A advisory give it a scale advantage — its $2.62 billion in annual revenue is roughly 37% larger than PIPR's trailing twelve-month figure of approximately $2.02 billion.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative valuation, business diversification, and recent catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find a nuanced case for each stock depending on an investor's time horizon and risk tolerance. PIPR currently exhibits stronger near-term earnings momentum, a lower valuation multiple, and an increasingly diversified platform — characteristics that algorithmic models often favor for tactical allocation in trend-following contexts. However, HLI's lower beta, higher dividend yield, counter-cyclical restructuring exposure, and substantial cash reserves present a more stable profile that may be preferred by AI strategies emphasizing risk-adjusted returns and downside protection. In a probabilistic framework, PIPR could be viewed as carrying stronger short- to medium-term momentum signals, while HLI may be seen as offering a more durable risk-reward profile over a longer investment horizon. Neither stock presents an unambiguous edge, and the AI's preference would depend on the specific strategy parameters of the bot evaluating them.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.74%.
HLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| HLI | PIPR | HLI / PIPR | |
| Capitalization | 9.24B | 5.54B | 167% |
| EBITDA | 616M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.443 | -5.662 | 414% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.22 | 18.17 | 122% |
| Revenue | 2.52B | 1.95B | 129% |
| Total Cash | 756M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 493M | 112M | 440% |
HLI | PIPR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLI's Valuation (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (14) in the null industry. This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLI (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLI’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HLI (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HLI (77) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.
HLI's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (86) in the null industry. This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
| HLI | PIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 59% | 23 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.