HLLY
Price
$2.12
Change
+$0.04 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
532.21M
60 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$88.47
Change
+$1.17 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.26B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLLY vs LEA

Header iconHLLY vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts HLLY vs LEABanner chart's image
Holley
Price$2.12
Change+$0.04 (+1.92%)
Volume$271.54K
Capitalization532.21M
Lear
Price$88.47
Change+$1.17 (+1.34%)
Volume$641.12K
Capitalization8.26B
HLLY vs LEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLLY vs. LEA commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLLY is a Buy and LEA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HLLY: $2.12 vs. LEA: $88.47)
Brand notoriety: HLLY and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLLY: 47% vs. LEA: 97%
Market capitalization -- HLLY: $532.21M vs. LEA: $8.26B
HLLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $532.21M. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than HLLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLLY is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

HLLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +9.28% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than HLLY($532M). HLLY has higher P/E ratio than LEA: HLLY (28.06) vs LEA (14.91). LEA YTD gains are higher at: -4.979 vs. HLLY (-29.801). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. HLLY (119M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. HLLY (41.1M). HLLY has less debt than LEA: HLLY (589M) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than HLLY: LEA (23.5B) vs HLLY (660M).
HLLYLEAHLLY / LEA
Capitalization532M8.26B6%
EBITDA119M1.48B8%
Gain YTD-29.801-4.979599%
P/E Ratio28.0614.91188%
Revenue660M23.5B3%
Total Cash41.1M1.2B3%
Total Debt589M2.92B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLLYLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPAY58.220.77
+1.34%
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
AVUS98.131.10
+1.13%
Avantis US Equity ETF
PSFM29.670.15
+0.52%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
LSAT39.52-0.08
-0.20%
LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF
UBND21.51-0.12
-0.55%
VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF

HLLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLLY has been loosely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLLY jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLLY
1D Price
Change %
HLLY100%
+1.92%
THRM - HLLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
VLEEY - HLLY
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
VC - HLLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
LEA - HLLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
SMP - HLLY
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.34%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
ADNT - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
MGA - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
BWA - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
More