Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) represent key players in the online brokerage space, catering to distinct investor bases amid rising interest in commission-free trading and fintech innovation. HOOD appeals to retail traders with its user-friendly app and cryptocurrency exposure, while IBKR serves professional and institutional clients with advanced global tools. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning, offering insights for traders evaluating relative performance in a volatile environment marked by shifting sentiment around trading volumes and digital assets. Investors seeking brokerage sector exposure or diversification may find value in understanding these contrasts.
Robinhood Markets (HOOD) operates a commission-free trading platform focused on stocks, options, ETFs (exchange-traded funds), and cryptocurrencies, targeting younger retail investors. In recent market activity, the stock has displayed heightened volatility, with shares trading around $82 after reaching a 52-week high near $154. Year-to-date gains hover around 27%, supported by broader trading enthusiasm, but recent weeks saw a pullback following Q1 2026 results. Revenue rose 15% year-over-year to $1.07 billion, with record funded customers at 27.4 million; however, earnings per share (EPS) of $0.38 missed expectations, primarily due to a 47% cryptocurrency revenue slump amid subdued digital asset prices. Elevated operating expenses and crypto dependency have tempered sentiment, though net deposits of $18 billion signal ongoing user engagement.
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) provides automated electronic brokerage services globally, offering execution in stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds, and cryptocurrencies to professional traders and institutions. Shares trade near $77, close to the 52-week high of $83, with year-to-date appreciation of about 21% reflecting steady momentum. Recent quarters highlight resilience, as Q1 2026 net revenues climbed 17% to $1.67 billion, surpassing estimates, with diluted EPS of $0.59. Client accounts grew 31% to 4.75 million, and equity balances hit a record $789 billion, up 38% year-over-year, fueled by diversified trading volumes and uninvested cash of $169 billion. Factors like expanded product offerings and geopolitical-driven activity have bolstered performance, contributing to a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 33.4 versus the sector average.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers across various asset classes. Out of 351 total bots, only the best 25 earn a spot in this section based on suitability for current market conditions, featuring diverse strategies such as swing trading, day trading, and pattern recognition with win rates often exceeding 60% and average returns ranging from 20-50% annually for top performers. These bots employ different timeframes, risk levels, and ticker sets, including high-volume stocks like those in fintech and brokerage sectors. Traders can explore performance statistics, backtests, and live results to align with their style. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots potentially suited for stocks like HOOD and IBKR.
HOOD and IBKR operate in the capital markets industry but diverge in business models: HOOD emphasizes retail accessibility and crypto (42% profit margin), while IBKR focuses on low-cost, high-volume institutional execution (16% margin) with global reach. Growth drivers include client additions for both, but IBKR's 38% equity surge outpaces HOOD's deposits amid volatility. Recent momentum favors IBKR for consistency post-earnings, versus HOOD's swings tied to crypto sentiment. Risk factors highlight HOOD's regulatory scrutiny and beta-driven exposure, contrasted with IBKR's lower volatility and dividend yield. Market sentiment leans toward IBKR for stability in uncertain conditions.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward IBKR over HOOD, citing superior trend consistency from record client metrics and earnings beats, alongside lower relative volatility and diversified revenue streams. While HOOD offers higher growth potential in retail crypto rallies, its recent misses introduce short-term uncertainty. This positioning suggests IBKR may exhibit stronger probabilistic outperformance in stable or rising rate environments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HOOD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HOOD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.06%.
HOOD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| HOOD | IBKR | HOOD / IBKR | |
| Capitalization | 69.5B | 38.8B | 179% |
| EBITDA | 2.22B | 9.42B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -31.795 | 35.428 | -90% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.45 | 37.34 | 100% |
| Revenue | 4.61B | 10.6B | 44% |
| Total Cash | 12.2B | 5.09B | 240% |
| Total Debt | 13.4B | 12M | 111,667% |
IBKR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HOOD | IBKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 19 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SHPD | 23.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Direxion Daily Shop Bear 1X ETF | |||
| SPCT | 27.19 | -0.23 | -0.85% |
| Liberty One Spectrum ETF | |||
| FMN | 11.14 | -0.10 | -0.89% |
| Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund | |||
| ETB | 15.07 | -0.25 | -1.66% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund | |||
| DFIS | 35.88 | -0.68 | -1.86% |
| Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOOD has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOOD jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | 100% | -4.41% | ||
| COIN - HOOD | 76% Closely correlated | -7.82% | ||
| IBKR - HOOD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| AFRM - HOOD | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| RJF - HOOD | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| U - HOOD | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||