Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) represent two prominent players in the brokerage sector, each catering to different segments of the trading community. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock performance, and market positioning amid evolving retail and institutional trading environments. Investors and traders evaluating exposure to financial technology and brokerage services may find this analysis relevant for assessing relative strengths in growth trajectories, revenue diversification, and operational scale. The review draws on observable metrics and developments from recent weeks to provide a factual basis for understanding how these stocks have responded to broader market conditions.
Robinhood Markets (HOOD) operates a commission-free brokerage platform primarily serving retail investors with access to stocks, options, cryptocurrencies, and other assets. The company has focused on expanding its Robinhood Gold subscription service and implementing share repurchase programs. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced volatility influenced by first-quarter 2026 results that showed revenue growth but missed expectations due to lower cryptocurrency trading volumes. Year-to-date performance has been positive though moderated compared to broader indices, with upcoming second-quarter earnings on July 29, 2026, likely to shape near-term sentiment. Factors such as user engagement metrics and transaction-based revenue have contributed to performance fluctuations in recent weeks.
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) provides an electronic brokerage platform with low-cost execution across global markets, serving professional traders, institutions, and international clients. The firm has reported consistent expansion in account numbers, client equity, and daily average revenue trades. In recent market activity, the stock has outperformed
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HOOD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HOOD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.05% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.58%.
HOOD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| HOOD | IBKR | HOOD / IBKR | |
| Capitalization | 85.2B | 40.9B | 208% |
| EBITDA | 2.22B | 9.42B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -16.083 | 42.950 | -37% |
| P/E Ratio | 46.07 | 36.41 | 127% |
| Revenue | 4.61B | 10.6B | 44% |
| Total Cash | 12.2B | 5.09B | 240% |
| Total Debt | 13.4B | 12M | 111,667% |
IBKR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HOOD | IBKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOOD has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOOD jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | 100% | -6.57% | ||
| COIN - HOOD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| IBKR - HOOD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| SBET - HOOD | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| AFRM - HOOD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RJF - HOOD | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 67% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| NDAQ - IBKR | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| SF - IBKR | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||