IBKR
Price
$93.25
Change
+$2.56 (+2.82%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.09B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MS
Price
$206.16
Change
+$3.58 (+1.77%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
318.17B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBKR vs MS

IBKR vs MS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 21, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Interactive Brokers (IBKR) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Interactive Brokers (IBKR) operates as a global electronic brokerage with high operational efficiency and strong growth in customer accounts and net interest income amid elevated interest rates.
  • Morgan Stanley (MS) delivers diversified financial services across institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management, reporting record quarterly revenues in the most recent period.
  • Over recent weeks, IBKR shares have shown resilience with modest gains, while MS has experienced more pronounced pullbacks amid broader market rotations.
  • IBKR benefits from a lean cost structure and international expansion, whereas MS leverages scale in wealth management with substantial net new asset inflows.
  • Valuation metrics reflect a premium for IBKR's growth trajectory compared to MS's more established but slower-expanding franchise.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between IBKR's niche brokerage momentum and MS's broader capital markets exposure.

Introduction

Traders and investors seeking to understand relative positioning within the capital markets sector often compare specialized brokerages with full-service financial institutions. Interactive Brokers (IBKR) and Morgan Stanley (MS) represent distinct approaches to serving retail, institutional, and high-net-worth clients. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and market sentiment in the current environment. The comparison appeals to those evaluating growth-oriented platforms versus diversified revenue streams, particularly amid shifting interest rate dynamics and trading volumes.

IBKR Overview and Recent Performance

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. provides automated global brokerage services across equities, options, futures, currencies, and other instruments. The firm maintains a low-cost structure that supports high pre-tax margins. In recent market activity, shares have traded near $90, reflecting gains in several sessions amid positive sentiment around account growth and interest income. Developments such as product expansions in international markets and sustained customer additions have supported performance. Broader rate environment has aided net interest income, contributing to steady momentum despite periodic volatility in trading volumes.

MS Overview and Recent Performance

Morgan Stanley operates as a global financial services firm with significant operations in institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management. Recent quarterly results highlighted record net revenues driven by equities, investment banking, and asset inflows. Stock prices around $202 have faced pressure in recent weeks, with declines noted amid market rotations. Factors influencing sentiment include strong wealth management net new assets and capital return initiatives, tempered by broader sector movements and valuation considerations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots suited to prevailing market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, only the most suitable based on current data earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating win rates between 60-80% or higher in backtested environments depending on the specific model. Users can explore detailed metrics on returns, drawdowns, and ticker coverage. For more information on these tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) focuses primarily on brokerage execution with a technology-driven, low-overhead model, while Morgan Stanley (MS) maintains a diversified platform encompassing trading, advisory, and asset management. Growth drivers for IBKR center on account expansion and margin lending efficiency; MS draws from wealth management scale and capital markets activity. Recent momentum has favored IBKR’s steadier trajectory versus MS’s sensitivity to market sentiment shifts. Risk factors include IBKR’s exposure to trading volume fluctuations and MS’s sensitivity to economic cycles and regulatory changes. Sector exposure overlaps in financial services, yet IBKR operates with narrower brokerage emphasis compared to MS’s integrated firm approach. Market sentiment reflects premium valuations for IBKR’s efficiency metrics against MS’s established dividend profile and share repurchase programs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in customer metrics, stability in interest income generation, and relative positioning amid rate dynamics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Interactive Brokers (IBKR). This assessment weighs recent account growth and operational leverage against Morgan Stanley’s (MS) broader but more variable revenue streams. Outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and company-specific catalysts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
IBKR vs. MS commentary
Sep 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBKR is a Hold and MS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($318B) has a higher market cap than IBKR($41.1B). IBKR has higher P/E ratio than MS: IBKR (35.99) vs MS (16.36). IBKR YTD gains are higher at: 41.441 vs. MS (15.991). IBKR has more cash in the bank: 7.71B vs. MS (4.29B). IBKR has less debt than MS: IBKR (13M) vs MS (422B). MS has higher revenues than IBKR: MS (73.1B) vs IBKR (11.1B).
IBKRMSIBKR / MS
Capitalization41.1B318B13%
EBITDA9.92BN/A-
Gain YTD41.44115.991259%
P/E Ratio35.9916.36220%
Revenue11.1B73.1B15%
Total Cash7.71B4.29B180%
Total Debt13M422B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBKR vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
IBKR
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
610
SMR RATING
1..100
455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (93). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (10). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBKR (45). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (48). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (51). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBKRMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2026
Stock price -- (IBKR: $90.69 vs. MS: $202.58)
Brand notoriety: IBKR: Not notable vs. MS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBKR: 163% vs. MS: 148%
Market capitalization -- IBKR: $41.09B vs. MS: $318.17B
IBKR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $41.09B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $318.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $318.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBKR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IBKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBKR is a better buy in the long-term than MS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBKR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBKR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than IBKR.

Price Growth

IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBKR is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.77% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
IBKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSC0.99N/A
N/A
Studio City International Holdings Limited
SANA3.10N/A
N/A
Sana Biotechnology
VTR86.69-1.02
-1.16%
Ventas
MANE106.75-1.93
-1.78%
Veradermics Inc
CALC1.92-0.05
-2.54%
CalciMedica Inc

IBKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBKR
1D Price
Change %
IBKR100%
+2.61%
HOOD - IBKR
68%
Closely correlated
+9.12%
RJF - IBKR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
MS - IBKR
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
GS - IBKR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
BMNR - IBKR
60%
Loosely correlated
+8.79%
More

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-0.46%
GS - MS
85%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
NDAQ - MS
71%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
EVR - MS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.00%
PIPR - MS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More