Advertisement
HUN vs LIN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntsman Corporation (HUN) vs. Linde plc (LIN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUN is a diversified chemicals manufacturer in the midst of a cyclical downturn, while LIN is a global industrial-gases and engineering leader with a more defensive, long-term contract base.
- LIN is consistently profitable with industry-leading margins, whereas HUN has posted consecutive quarterly and full-year losses amid soft demand and pricing pressure.
- Recent momentum has favored HUN, which has rallied sharply off depressed levels, but that rebound has not yet been matched by sustained earnings recovery.
- LIN offers steadier fundamentals and visible growth, while HUN carries higher cyclical leverage and turnaround risk.
- Investor sentiment is bifurcated: LIN is generally rated favorably by analysts, while HUN garners mixed ratings and a wide range of price targets.
- For more detail on each name, explore HUN Major News and HUN Today's Price Move, as well as LIN Major News and LIN Today's Price Move.
- To see how automated systems are positioning across these and thousands of other tickers, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Linde plc (LIN) both operate in the broader chemicals and industrial-materials landscape, yet they represent very different risk profiles and market positions. This stock comparison is useful for investors weighing a cyclical turnaround story against a steadier, compounder-style industrial franchise. Relative performance and market positioning have diverged meaningfully between the two names in recent months, making them a natural pairing for traders evaluating momentum, income quality, and balance-sheet resilience. The comparison is especially relevant for those balancing exposure to industrial end markets against the defensiveness of contracted, long-duration cash flows.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntsman Corporation is a diversified specialty and differentiated chemicals producer, organized primarily around polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials. The company's results are closely tied to industrial activity, construction, automotive, and coatings demand. In recent quarters, HUN has been navigating a challenging operating environment, with lower average selling prices, softer volumes in several segments, and persistent margin pressure. Its most recent quarterly report showed revenues down roughly 7% year over year alongside an adjusted per-share loss, while full-year sales declined and the company recorded a net loss.
Despite these fundamentals, HUN shares have displayed notable relative strength in recent weeks, rallying off depressed levels even as longer-term one-year returns remain negative. Management has emphasized restructuring, cost discipline, inventory alignment, and cash-flow preservation as levers to position the business for an eventual chemical-cycle recovery. Sentiment remains mixed, with analyst price targets spanning a wide range, reflecting uncertainty over the pace and durability of any demand recovery.
LIN Overview and Recent Performance
Linde plc is a global industrial-gases and engineering company serving end markets such as electronics, healthcare, food and beverage, chemicals and energy, and manufacturing. Its business model is anchored by long-term, take-or-pay supply contracts and high network density, which historically produces steadier, more defensive cash flows than commodity-exposed chemical peers. In recent reporting periods, LIN has delivered resilient results, with sales growth driven by price attainment, strong operating margins, and record-level adjusted earnings per share growth.
Unlike HUN, Linde remains solidly profitable, generating billions in operating cash flow and maintaining a substantial project backlog that provides multi-year revenue visibility. Management has reiterated disciplined capital allocation, including dividends and buybacks, while guiding to continued single-digit adjusted EPS growth. Recent market activity for LIN has been comparatively measured, consistent with its profile as a lower-volatility, quality-oriented industrial holding rather than a momentum-driven turnaround.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from a much larger library of automated strategies. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that monitor thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and set of covered securities. Rather than listing every bot, the page highlights only those considered most suitable for current market conditions, helping users cut through the noise. Because bots vary in volatility tolerance, holding period, and asset coverage, the platform allows traders to match an automated approach to their own objectives. Explore Trending AI Robots to review the strategies currently favored by the system.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most fundamental contrast is business-model durability. LIN generates stable, contracted revenue with margins near 30% on an adjusted basis and strong free cash flow, while HUN is more exposed to cyclical swings in pricing and volumes and is currently operating at a loss. Growth drivers differ as well: Linde's momentum leans on electronics-related gases, clean hydrogen, and project start-ups, whereas Huntsman's upside hinges on an eventual recovery in construction, coatings, and MDI (methylene diphenyl diisocyanate) supply-demand balance.
On recent momentum, HUN has outperformed over short windows, though this follows a deeper multi-year drawdown. Risk factors also diverge: Huntsman faces MDI overcapacity, soft construction demand, and pricing competition, while Linde's primary risks center on industrial stagnation and execution across a large project pipeline. In terms of market sentiment, LIN enjoys broader analyst support and a more consistent estimate trend, whereas HUN carries a split of buy and sell ratings and more volatile earnings revisions.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor LIN at present. The company demonstrates more consistent profitability, higher-quality cash flow, a substantial backlog, and a steadier earnings trajectory—attributes that tend to rank favorably in trend and stability-oriented models. While HUN has shown stronger short-term price momentum and potential turnaround appeal, its fundamentals remain under pressure, and the durability of its recent rebound is less certain. This assessment is probabilistic in nature and reflects relative positioning rather than a definitive prediction of future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUN is a StrongBuy and LIN is a StrongBuy.
HUN's RSI Indicator peaks and leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for HUN moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 19 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 17 of the 19 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 56 cases where HUN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HUN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
HUN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HUN as a result. In 59 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HUN just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where HUN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
HUN moved above its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for HUN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +10.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HUN advanced for three days, in 163 of 254 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 106 of 147 cases where HUN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 72%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 18 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.616) is normal, around the industry mean (1.147). P/E Ratio (-9.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (3.243). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.080) is also within normal values, averaging (3.769). Dividend Yield (0.037) settles around the average of (0.195) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.269) is also within normal values, averaging (0.578).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 48 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HUN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HUN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
LIN in +1.20% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on November 11, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where LIN advanced for three days, in 153 of 317 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for LIN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 6 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 105 of 252 cases where LIN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 42%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for LIN moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 14 of the 29 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 48%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 25 of 58 cases where LIN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 43%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LIN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 45%.
LIN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 84, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. LIN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 81 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.078) is normal, around the industry mean (2.284). P/E Ratio (33.092) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.137). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.827) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.094) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
HUN | LIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (18) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (81) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (92) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (50) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LIN (25) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | LIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 42% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while LIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2027.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-2.23% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.14% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.
LIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.