Advertisement
HUN vs LIN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntsman Corporation (HUN) vs. Linde plc (LIN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUN is navigating a transformative all-stock merger of equals with Olin Corporation, recently clearing key regulatory hurdles, amid ongoing challenges in the specialty chemicals sector.
- LIN reported strong second-quarter results with record project backlog and raised full-year guidance, reflecting resilient demand in industrial gases, particularly electronics.
- HUN shares have faced significant pressure in recent market activity, trading near the lower end of their 52-week range following earnings and merger developments.
- LIN maintains a larger market capitalization and more stable operational profile, with consistent earnings growth and broad sector exposure.
- Relative performance highlights contrasts in scale, with LIN demonstrating steadier momentum supported by long-term contracts versus HUN's higher volatility tied to cyclical chemicals and integration risks.
- Market sentiment favors established leaders like LIN for consistency, while HUN offers potential optionality from its pending combination.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare stocks within the materials and chemicals sector to assess relative positioning amid economic cycles, sector-specific demand, and corporate events. HUN (Huntsman Corporation) and LIN (Linde plc) represent distinct profiles in this space: one a mid-sized specialty chemicals producer undergoing strategic consolidation, the other a global leader in industrial gases with diversified end markets. This comparison is particularly relevant for those evaluating exposure to cyclical versus more defensive chemical subsectors, as well as the impact of mergers and backlog-driven growth on recent performance and market positioning.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntsman Corporation operates in specialty chemicals, serving markets including polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials. In recent weeks, HUN has been defined by its proposed all-stock merger of equals with Olin Corporation, which shareholders approved in late August and cleared the Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period in September. The combination aims to create a larger North American chemicals entity with enhanced integration across cycles. Second-quarter results showed revenue of $1.66 billion and improved adjusted EBITDA of $120 million year-over-year, though the company reported a modest net loss. Shares have traded lower amid integration considerations and broader sector softness, with the stock positioned near the bottom of its recent range and analyst ratings largely clustered around neutral.
LIN Overview and Recent Performance
Linde plc is the world’s largest industrial gases company, supplying oxygen, nitrogen, and other gases to sectors ranging from manufacturing and healthcare to electronics and energy. Recent market activity has featured continued execution on long-term contracts, with second-quarter sales rising 9% to $9.3 billion and adjusted diluted EPS increasing 10% to $4.50. Management raised the lower end of full-year 2026 guidance while highlighting a record $8.1 billion sale-of-gas backlog, driven notably by electronics demand. Shares have moderated from mid-year peaks but remain supported by steady cash generation and a consensus buy rating from analysts, reflecting the company’s scale and visibility into future projects.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability, consistent results, and robust statistics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to explore options aligned with different risk tolerances and trading styles. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and detailed performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HUN and LIN differ markedly in scale and business model. Huntsman focuses on specialty chemicals with greater cyclical exposure, while Linde provides essential industrial gases under long-term contracts that support more predictable revenue streams. Growth drivers for HUN center on the pending Olin merger and operational improvements, whereas LIN benefits from expanding backlog in high-tech applications. Recent momentum has been weaker for HUN amid merger-related volatility, contrasting with LIN’s steadier trajectory despite share-price moderation. Risk factors include integration execution for HUN and capital expenditure intensity plus margin pressures for LIN. Sector exposure places both in materials but positions Linde with broader defensive characteristics and Huntsman with higher sensitivity to industrial demand fluctuations. Market sentiment reflects these differences, with greater stability attributed to the larger, diversified gas supplier.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, backlog visibility, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to LIN. Its established scale, recurring revenue profile, and project pipeline provide a more stable foundation compared with the merger-driven uncertainties surrounding HUN. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing conditions rather than a definitive ranking.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUN is a Hold and LIN is a StrongBuy.
HUN | LIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (12) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (77) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (92) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (78) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | LIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 46% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while LIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-2.46% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.79% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.
LIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.