IESC
Price
$328.56
Change
-$6.50 (-1.94%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.53B
120 days until earnings call
PWR
Price
$387.54
Change
-$1.58 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.74B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IESC vs PWR

Header iconIESC vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts IESC vs PWRBanner chart's image
IES Holdings
Price$328.56
Change-$6.50 (-1.94%)
Volume$935
Capitalization6.53B
Quanta Services
Price$387.54
Change-$1.58 (-0.41%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization57.74B
IESC vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IESC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IESC vs. PWR commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IESC: $335.06 vs. PWR: $389.12)
Brand notoriety: IESC and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESC: 90% vs. PWR: 97%
Market capitalization -- IESC: $6.65B vs. PWR: $57.98B
IESC [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.65B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $57.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than PWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IESC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IESC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than IESC.

Price Growth

IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -5.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +482.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

IESC is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-1.21% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($57.7B) has a higher market cap than IESC($6.53B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than IESC: PWR (60.08) vs IESC (25.13). IESC YTD gains are higher at: 66.730 vs. PWR (23.238). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. IESC (412M). PWR has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. IESC (168M). IESC has less debt than PWR: IESC (72.7M) vs PWR (5.11B). PWR has higher revenues than IESC: PWR (26.1B) vs IESC (3.25B).
IESCPWRIESC / PWR
Capitalization6.53B57.7B11%
EBITDA412M2.37B17%
Gain YTD66.73023.238287%
P/E Ratio25.1360.0842%
Revenue3.25B26.1B12%
Total Cash168M509M33%
Total Debt72.7M5.11B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1262
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2010
SMR RATING
1..100
2457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3710
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IESC's Valuation (73) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (93). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (20). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (57). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (37). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (25). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IESCPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IESC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOCL56.190.11
+0.20%
Global X Social Media ETF
XHYH35.37-0.04
-0.12%
BondBloxx US High Yield Hlthcr Sctr ETF
DLN83.33-0.16
-0.19%
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
KSPY27.05-0.06
-0.23%
KraneShares Hedgeye Hedged Eq Idx ETF
NML8.68-0.03
-0.34%
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then EME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
-1.92%
EME - IESC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
STRL - IESC
75%
Closely correlated
+9.14%
MTZ - IESC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
PWR - IESC
70%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
PRIM - IESC
70%
Closely correlated
+16.65%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-1.14%
MTZ - PWR
85%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
PRIM - PWR
84%
Closely correlated
+16.65%
EME - PWR
81%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
STRL - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+9.14%
IESC - PWR
72%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
More