| IMCB | SCHM | IMCB / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 18.173 | 16.326 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 14.3B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 133% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 17.00 | 171% |
| Yield | 1.22 | 1.20 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| IMCB | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XYLD | 40.97 | 0.45 | +1.11% |
| Global X S&P 500® Covered Call ETF | |||
| PAB | 41.75 | 0.08 | +0.19% |
| PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| LITL | 33.52 | 0.05 | +0.14% |
| Simplify Piper Sandler Us Small-Cap Plus Income ETF | |||
| LIAU | 255.98 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF | |||
| RUNN | 33.94 | -0.43 | -1.25% |
| Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCB has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCB jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCB | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| FTV - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CG - IMCB | 78% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| ARES - IMCB | 77% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| EQH - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| APO - IMCB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +1.90% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.38% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +15.37% | ||
More | ||||