BSAC
Price
$32.26
Change
-$0.62 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.48B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$12.59
Change
-$0.20 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.18B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs NU

BSAC vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) vs. Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) reported Q1 2026 net income of Ch$273 billion with ROAE (return on average equity) of 23%, showcasing operational efficiency in a low-inflation Chilean market.
  • NU reached 131 million customers by end-2025, with Q4 revenue up 45% YoY to $4.9 billion and net income surging 50% to $895 million, highlighting rapid digital expansion.
  • BSAC offers stability with a 3.6% dividend yield and lower P/E ratio around 10-12, appealing to value investors in regional banking.
  • NU demonstrates higher growth potential through customer acquisition and multi-country operations but faces volatility with recent share price declines amid valuation concerns.
  • Both stocks operate in Latin American financial services, but BSAC emphasizes traditional efficiency while NU leverages digital scalability.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC), a leading traditional bank in Chile, against Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU), a fast-growing digital banking platform primarily in Brazil with expansions into Mexico and Colombia. Both companies serve the Latin American financial sector, offering exposure to regional economic trends like inflation dynamics and digital adoption. Value-oriented investors may prefer BSAC's stability and dividends, while growth traders might favor NU's customer momentum and revenue scalability. Recent market activity underscores contrasts in relative performance and sentiment, aiding informed portfolio decisions in volatile emerging markets.

BSAC Overview and Recent Performance

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC), a subsidiary of Spain's Santander Group, is Chile's largest bank by loans, providing commercial, retail, and mortgage services with about 8,500 employees. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $30-31, reflecting a year-to-date gain of roughly 1-4% amid broader financial sector pressures. Q1 2026 results highlighted resilience, with net income attributable to shareholders at Ch$273 billion (US$272 million), up 7% quarter-over-quarter, driven by 4.5% YoY fee growth and controlled expenses yielding a 32.5% efficiency ratio—best among Chilean peers. ROAE stood at 23%, supported by net interest income up 7.9% YoY despite moderated inflation impacting margins (NIM at 3.8%). Sentiment remains positive on dividend strength (3.6% yield, payout ratio 43%) and CET1 ratio of 10.9%, though shares dipped post-earnings on revenue misses amid economic uncertainty.

NU Overview and Recent Performance

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU), operating as Nubank, delivers digital banking via apps in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and beyond, focusing on credit cards, payments, and accounts without physical branches. Shares have faced pressure recently, trading near $13.80 after a 3% daily drop and YTD decline of about 17%, contrasting strong long-term gains (133% over three years). End-2025 results showed 131 million customers (up 17 million YoY, 83% activity rate), Q4 revenue of $4.9 billion (+45% YoY), and net income of $895 million (+50%), with ROE at 33% and efficiency improving. Credit portfolio grew 40% to $32.7 billion, fueled by unsecured lending. Recent weeks reflect valuation debates despite analyst targets around $19-20, with expansion plans including $8.2 billion Brazil investment and U.S. banking charter pursuits influencing sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These curated bots are identified by AI analysis as most promising for current market conditions, featuring annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70—far outperforming benchmarks in areas like semiconductors, industrials, space infrastructure, and financial services. For instance, top agents deliver +167-285% returns with 70-75% win rates on short timeframes. While none specifically target BSAC or NU, financial bots cover similar regional banks. Traders can explore copy trading with real-time signals and risk controls. Visit Trending AI Robots to evaluate bots suited to your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) both anchor Latin American banking but diverge in models: BSAC's established branch network drives steady NII (net interest income) from mortgages and commercial loans in stable Chile, while NU's app-only platform scales via low-cost customer adds in high-growth Brazil. Growth drivers contrast sharply—NU's 22% customer CAGR and ARPAC (average revenue per active customer) rise versus BSAC's modest fee expansion. Recent momentum favors BSAC with Q1 ROAE stability amid inflation slowdowns, but NU boasts superior revenue scale ($15B+ TTM). Risks include BSAC's Chilean GDP sensitivity and NU's emerging-market volatility/competition. Sector exposure overlaps in consumer finance, but sentiment tilts toward NU for digital upside despite higher P/E (24x vs. BSAC's 10-12x).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) due to stronger trend consistency in customer growth, higher ROE (33% recently), and scalable catalysts like international expansion, positioning it better for emerging market upswings. While BSAC offers stability and value, NU's relative momentum and profitability metrics suggest a higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though with elevated volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BSAC vs. NU commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a Buy and NU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BSAC: $32.88 vs. NU: $12.79)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and NU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 84% vs. NU: 74%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $15.48B vs. NU: $62.18B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.48B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $62.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSAC is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSAC is a better buy in the short-term than NU.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU($62.2B) has a higher market cap than BSAC($15.5B). NU has higher P/E ratio than BSAC: NU (19.73) vs BSAC (13.84). BSAC YTD gains are higher at: 16.592 vs. NU (-23.596). NU has less debt than BSAC: NU (1.92B) vs BSAC (13.7T). BSAC has higher revenues than NU: BSAC (2.86T) vs NU (11.9B).
BSACNUBSAC / NU
Capitalization15.5B62.2B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.592-23.596-70%
P/E Ratio13.8419.7370%
Revenue2.86T11.9B23,992%
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total Debt13.7T1.92B714,129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VISN12.880.22
+1.74%
Vistance Networks Inc.
INVH28.440.03
+0.11%
Invitation Homes
SERV6.80-0.19
-2.72%
Serve Robotics
CMND2.98-0.09
-2.93%
Clearmind Medicine Inc.
BSAA13.05-1.41
-9.73%
BEST SPAC I Acquisition Corp

BSAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with BCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then BCH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSAC
1D Price
Change %
BSAC100%
+0.74%
BCH - BSAC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
ITUB - BSAC
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
BBD - BSAC
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
BSBR - BSAC
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
CIB - BSAC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More