INTU
Price
$296.76
Change
-$5.22 (-1.73%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.17B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MANH
Price
$147.64
Change
-$2.94 (-1.95%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.74B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTU vs MANH

Header iconINTU vs MANH Comparison
Open Charts INTU vs MANHBanner chart's image
INTU vs MANH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs. Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Intuit’s earnings beat and AI‑driven product rollout have steadied its price, delivering modest upside in recent weeks.
  • Manhattan Associates is benefitting from robust e‑commerce demand and raised guidance, resulting in stronger momentum.
  • Both companies operate in high‑margin SaaS (software‑as‑a‑service) models, but Intuit’s consumer‑facing products offer broader diversification.
  • Relative valuation favors Manhattan Associates on a price‑to‑sales basis, while Intuit trades at a premium P/E (price‑to‑earnings) reflecting its larger scale.
  • Risk factors differ: Intuit faces regulatory scrutiny in tax software, whereas Manhattan is sensitive to global supply‑chain cycles.

Introduction

Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) are two prominent SaaS‑driven public equities that have attracted attention from both growth‑oriented traders and income‑focused investors. Their recent earnings releases, coupled with shifting macro trends in digital payments and supply‑chain automation, make a side‑by‑side comparison valuable for anyone weighing short‑term momentum against longer‑term structural growth. This article delivers an objective snapshot of how each stock is positioned in the current market environment.

INTU Overview and Recent Performance

Intuit provides financial management, tax preparation, and payroll solutions through flagship brands QuickBooks, TurboTax, and Mint. Over the past few weeks the stock has rallied roughly 4‑5% after the company posted fiscal Q2 results that topped revenue expectations, driven by strong small‑business adoption of QuickBooks Online and higher‑than‑anticipated usage of TurboTax assisted by new AI‑powered filing features. The earnings release highlighted a 13% year‑over‑year increase in subscription revenue and a modest 2% rise in net income, while the board approved an additional $2 billion share‑repurchase program, reinforcing shareholder return. Analyst sentiment turned neutral‑to‑positive as the guidance for FY24 earnings per share (EPS) was nudged upward, reflecting confidence in Intuit’s AI‑enhanced product roadmap and the continued migration of accounting functions to the cloud.

MANH Overview and Recent Performance

Manhattan Associates offers supply‑chain and omnichannel commerce software, including warehouse execution, inventory management, and transportation management systems. The company’s recent earnings cycle showed a 15% year‑over‑year revenue gain, propelled by heightened demand for its Warehouse Management System (WMS) as e‑commerce volumes rebound. Management raised full‑year forecasts for both revenue and adjusted earnings, citing strong order intake from North American retailers and expanding international contracts. Consequently, MANH has outperformed the broader tech index, climbing about 8% in the last three weeks. Momentum is further supported by a strategic partnership announced with a major cloud provider, positioning Manhattan’s suite for faster deployment and reinforcing its competitive moat.

Trending AI Robots

The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases a curated set of the platform’s most effective algorithmic trading bots. While hundreds of bots operate across thousands of tickers, only those with consistent win‑rates (often 60‑70%+) and robust risk‑adjusted returns (average annual ROI ranging from 15% to 30%) earn a spot in this section. The bots employ diverse strategies—trend‑following, mean‑reversion, and volatility‑scaled—across multiple timeframes, providing traders with tailored options for short‑term scalping or longer‑term position‑sizing. For investors interested in automated insights, reviewing the trending bots can highlight which models currently align best with market conditions. Explore the collection to see which AI‑driven approaches are leading the pack.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: Both firms run subscription‑based SaaS platforms, but Intuit serves a broader consumer base (tax, personal finance) while Manhattan focuses on enterprise supply‑chain solutions.
  • Growth Drivers: Intuit benefits from AI enhancements in tax filing and expanding QuickBooks ecosystem; Manhattan’s growth is tied to e‑commerce volume recovery and global logistics digitization.
  • Recent Momentum: Manhattan has shown stronger price momentum (≈8% gain) versus Intuit’s modest 4‑5% rise, reflecting more upbeat guidance.
  • Valuation: Intuit trades at a higher P/E multiple, reflecting its scale and brand strength; Manhattan trades at a lower price‑to‑sales ratio, suggesting relative discount.
  • Risk Profile: Intuit faces regulatory and seasonal tax‑filing risk; Manhattan is exposed to macro‑economic supply‑chain cycles and corporate IT spending trends.
  • Sector Exposure: Intuit is classified under Financial Services/Software; Manhattan falls under Information Technology – Software & Services, with a heavier tilt toward industrial logistics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on recent price consistency, earnings momentum, and forward‑looking catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models assign a slightly higher probability of short‑term outperformance to MANH. The stock’s sharper rally, upgraded guidance, and expanding partnership ecosystem suggest stronger near‑term tailwinds. However, Intuit’s larger market presence, ongoing AI product upgrades, and shareholder return program keep it in close contention, especially for investors prioritizing stability and brand diversification.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
INTU vs. MANH commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTU is a StrongBuy and MANH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2026
Stock price -- (INTU: $296.76 vs. MANH: $147.64)
Brand notoriety: INTU: Notable vs. MANH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTU: 137% vs. MANH: 71%
Market capitalization -- INTU: $81.17B vs. MANH: $8.74B
INTU [@Packaged Software] is valued at $81.17B. MANH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $218.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • INTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MANH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTU is a better buy in the long-term than MANH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MANH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INTU is a better buy in the short-term than MANH.

Price Growth

INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.49% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

MANH is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.49% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTU($81.2B) has a higher market cap than MANH($8.74B). MANH has higher P/E ratio than INTU: MANH (41.36) vs INTU (18.11). MANH YTD gains are higher at: -14.812 vs. INTU (-54.979). INTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.55B vs. MANH (288M). INTU has more cash in the bank: 2.98B vs. MANH (226M). MANH has less debt than INTU: MANH (55.7M) vs INTU (6.89B). INTU has higher revenues than MANH: INTU (20.1B) vs MANH (1.1B).
INTUMANHINTU / MANH
Capitalization81.2B8.74B930%
EBITDA6.55B288M2,274%
Gain YTD-54.979-14.812371%
P/E Ratio18.1141.3644%
Revenue20.1B1.1B1,826%
Total Cash2.98B226M1,316%
Total Debt6.89B55.7M12,366%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTU vs MANH: Fundamental Ratings
INTU
MANH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
671
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
4112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INTU's Valuation (11) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for MANH (88). This means that INTU’s stock grew significantly faster than MANH’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (100). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's SMR Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (41). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (66). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (98). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTUMANH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MANH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTERU10.39N/A
N/A
Globa Terra Acquisition Corp
FCRS10.24-0.01
-0.10%
FutureCrest Acquisition Corp.
ABLV1.07-0.01
-1.38%
Able View Global
PSNY18.90-0.51
-2.63%
Polestar Automotive Hldg
RRC39.10-1.39
-3.43%
Range Resources Corp