Software stocks are rarely interchangeable, and the contrast between Intuit Inc. and Manhattan Associates Inc. highlights just how differently two well-established technology companies can be valued, traded, and perceived in the same market environment. Both serve essential business functions — one operates at the intersection of consumer finance and small-business accounting, the other powers global supply chain logistics — yet their recent stock performances have diverged dramatically. For traders and investors weighing exposure to enterprise software, financial technology, or supply chain automation, comparing INTU and MANH offers a practical lens through which to assess valuations, growth trajectories, and risk sentiment across two distinct corners of the technology sector.
Intuit Inc. is a Mountain View, California-based financial technology platform whose products — TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma, Mailchimp, and Intuit Enterprise Suite — serve approximately 100 million customers worldwide. The company generated $8.6 billion in revenue during its most recent fiscal quarter, reflecting 10% year-over-year growth, and raised its full-year fiscal 2026 revenue guidance to roughly $21.3–$21.4 billion.
Despite these operational metrics, INTU shares have been under sustained pressure. Over the past year the stock has declined roughly 61%, with its 200-day simple moving average sitting near $407 — well above the recent trading range around $291. The sell-off accelerated in recent weeks following a series of analyst actions: Goldman Sachs downgraded the stock from Neutral to Sell with a $276 price target in early June, while Stifel cut its rating from Buy to Hold and lowered its target to $275. Both firms cited expectations that management will reduce long-term growth targets for TurboTax and the Global Business Solutions segment.
Adding to the headwinds, multiple law firms have filed securities class-action lawsuits against Intuit, alleging violations related to the period surrounding the stock's guidance-driven decline. The company also announced a 17% workforce reduction in May, framing it as a restructuring to create a faster, leaner organization focused on its AI-driven platform strategy. On the positive side, Intuit's aggressive share buyback program — approximately $1 billion per quarter — and a recently raised $1.20 quarterly dividend signal management's confidence in long-term cash generation.
Manhattan Associates Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, develops supply chain and omnichannel commerce software solutions. Its cloud-native Manhattan Active platform encompasses warehouse management, transportation management, and order management, serving retailers, manufacturers, and third-party logistics providers globally. The company was named a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) for the 18th consecutive year.
Manhattan Associates delivered first-quarter 2026 revenue of $282.2 million, a 7.4% year-over-year increase that exceeded consensus estimates, alongside earnings per share (EPS) of $1.24 — also above expectations. Cloud revenue grew 24%, and management raised its full-year EPS guidance to a range of $5.29–$5.37. The company's return on equity (ROE) stands at an impressive 78.1%, and its operating margin of roughly 25.6% remains well above the broader market median.
MANH shares recently staged a notable recovery, climbing approximately 24% over a seven-day winning streak that pushed the stock from around $132 to above $163. The 50-day simple moving average has now crossed above the 200-day moving average — a technical pattern some traders interpret as bullish. Over the past year, however, the stock remains down roughly 20%, reflecting the broader rotation away from higher-valuation software names that characterized much of the last twelve months. Analysts maintain a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating with an average price target near $199.45, implying further upside from current levels.
For traders who prefer a data-driven approach to navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of algorithmic trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance track records. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market dynamics earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. Many featured bots showcase annualized returns that can range from the mid-teens to well above 30%, depending on the strategy and risk parameters employed. Whether you are interested in swing trading, trend following, or mean-reversion approaches, this curated list helps filter through the noise to highlight what is working right now. Explore the full selection of bots at Trending AI Robots to see which strategies align with your market outlook.
Business Model and Market Exposure. Intuit operates at the intersection of consumer tax preparation, small-business accounting, and personal finance — segments tied to annual filing cycles, small-business formation rates, and consumer credit activity. Manhattan Associates serves enterprise supply chain and logistics operations, a domain driven by warehouse automation investment, e-commerce fulfillment complexity, and global trade flows. These end markets carry different cyclical sensitivities: INTU is more exposed to U.S. consumer and small-business health, while MANH's demand correlates with corporate capital spending on logistics infrastructure.
Valuation Contrast. The valuation gap between the two is stark. INTU trades at approximately 11x forward earnings and a price-to-sales ratio around 3x — both below industry averages — reflecting the market's repricing of perceived AI disruption risk. MANH, by contrast, trades at roughly 45x trailing earnings and 9x sales, suggesting the market is still pricing in a premium for its cloud transition and supply chain software leadership. For value-oriented investors, INTU's compressed multiple may appear attractive; growth-focused investors may find MANH's premium justified by its higher ROE and expanding cloud revenue.
Recent Momentum and Sentiment. MANH has demonstrated stronger near-term momentum, with its stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages after the recent rally. INTU remains below both moving averages, with its 200-day moving average near $407 representing a substantial gap from current levels. Sentiment diverges further: INTU faces active securities litigation, downgrades from major banks, and uncertainty ahead of its September analyst day, while MANH's news flow has centered on product innovation — including the launch of Sightline AI for supply chain planning — and partnership wins.
Capital Returns. INTU returns significant capital to shareholders via buybacks and a 1.6% dividend yield, supported by $6.8 billion in cash and investments. MANH does not pay a dividend and carries a modest buyback program, reinvesting more heavily into its cloud platform transition. This distinction may matter to income-oriented investors but is less relevant for those focused purely on capital appreciation.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative positioning within their respective sectors, and the current balance of catalysts versus headwinds, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely tilt toward MANH in the current environment. Manhattan Associates' recent technical breakout above key moving averages, accelerating cloud revenue growth, sustained market leadership in warehouse management systems, and comparatively cleaner news cycle provide a steadier foundation for trend-following strategies. Intuit's deeply discounted valuation and aggressive capital return program are meaningful positives, but the combination of analyst downgrades, pending litigation, and uncertainty around upcoming growth-target revisions introduces variables that can challenge shorter-term trend signals. That said, for longer-horizon investors who believe the AI disruption narrative around INTU is overplayed — as some prominent fund managers have recently argued — the current entry point could prove compelling. The AI verdict favors MANH for trend consistency in the near term, while acknowledging that INTU's valuation may eventually attract value-seeking capital if execution stabilizes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.03% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.33%.
INTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| INTU | MANH | INTU / MANH | |
| Capitalization | 88.1B | 11.1B | 794% |
| EBITDA | 6.92B | 288M | 2,404% |
| Gain YTD | -50.948 | 9.994 | -510% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.64 | 54.62 | 36% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 1.1B | 1,898% |
| Total Cash | 8.44B | 226M | 3,735% |
| Total Debt | 6.9B | 55.7M | 12,388% |
INTU | MANH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INTU's Valuation (11) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for MANH (91). This means that INTU’s stock grew significantly faster than MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (100). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (43). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (61). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTU (98). This means that MANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTU’s over the last 12 months.
| INTU | MANH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 67% | 16 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| WDAY - INTU | 73% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CLSK - INTU | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.56% | ||
| COIN - INTU | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| TEAM - INTU | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| MANH - INTU | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||