Advertisement
INTU vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs. Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- INTU has been under significant selling pressure recently, with shares trading well below their 52-week high following a workforce reduction and softer tax-season guidance.
- TEAM has shown strong relative momentum, rallying sharply in recent weeks after reporting accelerating cloud growth and a swing to profitability.
- The two companies operate in different software niches: Intuit focuses on financial and tax software, while Atlassian targets team collaboration and project management.
- Intuit offers a dividend and trades at a lower earnings multiple, whereas Atlassian commands a growth-oriented valuation with no dividend.
- Market sentiment has diverged sharply, favoring TEAM's AI-driven growth narrative over INTU's defensive value profile in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines two widely followed software companies that sit at opposite ends of the recent market momentum spectrum: Intuit Inc. (INTU), the financial and tax software leader behind TurboTax, QuickBooks, and Credit Karma, and Atlassian Corporation (TEAM), the collaboration software provider behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello. Investors weighing defensive profitability against faster-growing, AI-driven (artificial intelligence) expansion may find this relative performance comparison useful. Both stocks carry meaningful technology-sector exposure but respond to very different catalysts, making the contrast between their market positioning instructive for traders and long-term investors alike.
INTU Overview and Recent Performance
Intuit Inc. provides financial management, tax, and small-business software, generating roughly $21.5 billion in trailing revenue. In recent weeks, INTU has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range, a notable reversal from its prior highs. The stock has lagged the broader market over the trailing year, reflecting investor concerns tied to a 17% workforce reduction and management's decision to lower its TurboTax revenue outlook amid slower do-it-yourself filer growth. While the company continues to post revenue growth and expanding profitability, the market has focused on the competitive risks that AI-driven tax tools pose to its consumer franchise. Strong capital returns, including a raised dividend and share repurchases, have provided partial support but have not offset the cautious sentiment.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian Corporation develops software that helps teams plan, collaborate, and track work, anchored by its Jira and Confluence products. In recent weeks, TEAM has rallied significantly, recovering toward the upper end of its 52-week range after its latest quarterly results showed revenue growth of roughly 28% and cloud revenue accelerating to about 31%. A key turning point was the company's swing to positive operating income, supported by expanding non-GAAP (adjusted) margins. Investors have responded favorably to growing adoption of Rovo, Atlassian's AI assistant, and to strong remaining performance obligations (RPO), which signal contracted future revenue. This momentum reflects renewed confidence in the company's cloud transition and AI strategy.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a more systematic approach to relative performance, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI trading bots drawn from a larger universe of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they monitor. Only those considered best suited to current market conditions are featured in this curated section. Exploring the page can help investors identify automated approaches aligned with their own risk tolerance and market positioning.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two companies diverge on nearly every comparative dimension. Intuit is a mature, highly profitable business with a dividend yield near 2% and a relatively low price-to-earnings multiple, but its growth has decelerated and its consumer tax franchise faces heightened competitive scrutiny. Atlassian, by contrast, is still scaling toward consistent profitability, carries no dividend, and trades at a much higher valuation multiple, yet it is generating faster revenue growth and accelerating cloud momentum.
Their risk profiles also differ. Intuit's risk centers on AI disruption of its tax business and slowing customer growth, while Atlassian's risk relates to execution during its multiyear data-center-to-cloud migration and the heavy investment required to sustain AI innovation. Net revenue retention (NRR) above 120% for Atlassian highlights strong expansion within existing customers, whereas Intuit's strength lies in its diversified consumer and small-business cash flows. Sentiment currently favors Atlassian's growth trajectory, though Intuit's valuation and capital returns appeal to more value-oriented positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent relative performance, and the presence of clear catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor TEAM at present. Atlassian's positive momentum, accelerating cloud revenue, expanding profitability, and strong AI adoption narrative provide a more consistent trend profile than Intuit's ongoing repricing. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive forecast; Intuit's lower valuation, dividend, and durable cash flows could appeal under different market conditions. The AI verdict reflects current positioning rather than a permanent judgment on either company's long-term quality.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTU is a Buy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.
INTU | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INTU's Valuation (12) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's SMR Rating (41) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that INTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as INTU (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTU (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than INTU’s over the last 12 months.
| INTU | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 67% | 15 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INTU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а +7.99% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
INTU is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.86% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
INTU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| WDAY - INTU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| NOW - INTU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CLSK - INTU | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| CRM - INTU | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| COIN - INTU | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| NOW - TEAM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||