IYW
Price
$243.48
Change
-$5.27 (-2.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
24.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LRNZ
Price
$61.92
Change
-$1.81 (-2.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
40.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs LRNZ

IYW vs LRNZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) offers broad, passive exposure to the U.S. technology sector through a market-cap-weighted index, holding approximately 139 securities with heavy concentration in mega-cap names such as NVDA, AAPL, and Alphabet (GOOGL/GOOG).
  • TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed, concentrated thematic fund with roughly 25 holdings focused on companies deriving significant revenue or competitive advantage from artificial intelligence and deep learning technologies.
  • Expense ratios differ materially: IYW charges 0.38% while LRNZ carries 0.69%, reflecting its active strategy and smaller asset base.
  • IYW provides diversified sector exposure within technology hardware, software, and semiconductors, whereas LRNZ emphasizes narrower AI-driven themes, resulting in higher potential volatility and idiosyncratic risk.
  • Both ETFs target technology investors but serve distinct roles: IYW suits core technology allocations, while LRNZ appeals to those seeking targeted AI and deep learning exposure.
  • Liquidity profiles favor IYW due to its larger scale and higher average trading volume compared with the more specialized LRNZ.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology exposure face a choice between broad sector representation and specialized thematic strategies. The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) both focus on U.S. and global technology equities yet employ markedly different approaches. IYW delivers diversified, passive access to the technology sector, while LRNZ pursues active management centered on artificial intelligence and deep learning. These ETFs do not compete directly for the same mandate; instead, they offer complementary or alternative pathways for investors balancing broad technology sector exposure with targeted innovation themes in the current market environment.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of an index composed of U.S. equities in the technology sector. The fund holds approximately 139 securities and is market-capitalization weighted. Its top holdings typically include NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation), AAPL (Apple Inc.), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL and GOOG), and other large technology companies, with the top ten positions often accounting for over 60% of assets. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology, including semiconductors and semiconductor equipment, alongside meaningful exposure to communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.38%. IYW follows a rules-based, market-cap methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to its underlying index. The fund is structured as a traditional equity ETF, providing liquid access to the technology sector without leverage or inverse features.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) Overview

The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks thematic exposure to a concentrated portfolio of technology companies significantly involved in artificial intelligence and deep learning. The fund typically holds 20–30 positions selected by the portfolio manager based on revenue exposure or competitive advantage in AI applications. Expense ratio is 0.69%. Unlike broad sector funds, LRNZ does not track a published index; instead, it employs active security selection and periodic portfolio adjustments. Holdings are global in scope but emphasize companies with innovative AI solutions. The strategy results in a more concentrated risk profile compared with diversified technology ETFs, with rebalancing driven by fundamental and thematic considerations rather than index rules.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, semiconductor innovation, and enterprise software adoption. Macroeconomic drivers include corporate spending on digital transformation and expectations around interest rate trajectories that influence growth-oriented equities. Regulatory developments in data privacy, antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms, and export controls on advanced chips represent ongoing risks. Capital flows into AI-themed strategies have accelerated in recent market cycles, while broader technology indices reflect both mega-cap leadership and rotation toward smaller innovators. Sector risks encompass valuation compression during periods of higher rates and potential slowdowns in technology capital expenditures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has exhibited performance closely aligned with large-capitalization technology leaders, benefiting from earnings strength in semiconductors and consumer electronics. Its broader diversification has moderated volatility relative to more concentrated peers during sector rotations. The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has shown greater sensitivity to AI-specific catalysts, including advancements in machine learning models and enterprise adoption trends, resulting in periods of outperformance during strong AI momentum and underperformance during broader technology pullbacks. Relative positioning highlights IYW’s lower cost and higher liquidity versus LRNZ’s targeted exposure, which may amplify returns in favorable AI environments but introduces higher idiosyncratic risk.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, greater diversification, higher liquidity, and established passive structure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probability to the iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) for investors seeking core technology exposure. The TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) may appeal to those prioritizing concentrated AI thematic positioning, though its higher cost and active mandate introduce additional considerations around manager skill and concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. LRNZ commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and LRNZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 24.5B vs. LRNZ (40.3M). LRNZ has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: LRNZ (29.934) vs IYW (22.016). IYW was incepted earlier than LRNZ: IYW (26 years) vs LRNZ (6 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than LRNZ (0.69). LRNZ has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWLRNZIYW / LRNZ
Gain YTD22.01629.93474%
Net Assets24.5B40.3M60,794%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.6955%
Turnover7.0028.0025%
Yield0.100.00-
Fund Existence26 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWLRNZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LRNZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEE88.341.97
+2.28%
Nextera Energy Inc
IDT58.820.87
+1.50%
IDT Corp
BCYC4.10N/A
N/A
Bicycle Therapeutics plc
PLSM5.56N/A
N/A
Pulsenmore Ltd.
ST45.34-1.21
-2.60%
Sensata Technologies Holding plc

LRNZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRNZ has been closely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRNZ jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRNZ
1D Price
Change %
LRNZ100%
-2.83%
NET - LRNZ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SNOW - LRNZ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
TWLO - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
AI - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
VRNS - LRNZ
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More