The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for JL turned positive on November 11, 2026. Looking at past instances where JL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 19 of 21 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where JL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 16 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 24 of 30 cases where JL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on JL as a result. In 40 of 50 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
JL moved above its 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +26.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where JL advanced for three days, in 140 of 153 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
JL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where JL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for JL entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 48 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.313) is normal, around the industry mean (2.911). P/E Ratio (23.793) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.016). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.686). Dividend Yield (0.214) settles around the average of (0.328) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.370) is also within normal values, averaging (0.827).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. JL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. JL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
On November 06, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for XELB moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 70 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 62 of the 70 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 89%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where XELB's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 33 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on XELB as a result. In 83 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XELB just turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where XELB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 47 of 55 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +10.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XELB advanced for three days, in 171 of 209 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XELB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
XELB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for XELB entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 35 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.205) is normal, around the industry mean (2.911). P/E Ratio (-0.142) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.016). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.075) is also within normal values, averaging (0.686). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.328) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.017) is also within normal values, averaging (0.827).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. XELB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. XELB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
XELB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| JL | XELB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while XELB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XELB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
JL (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +9.27% price change this week, while XELB (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.84%.
XELB is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
A.I.dvisor tells us that JL and DECK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JL and DECK's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XELB and RL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XELB and RL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XELB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XELB | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| RL - XELB | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| VFC - XELB | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| JL - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | +16.36% | ||
| VRA - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| CROX - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||