Advertisement
VFC vs XELB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VFC is a Hold and XELB is a Buy.
Aroon Indicator for VFC shows an upward move is likely
VFC's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on November 11, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 138 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 109 of the 138 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +2.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VFC advanced for three days, in 199 of 288 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
VFC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. VFC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.534) is normal, around the industry mean (2.911). P/E Ratio (29.071) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.016). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.363) is also within normal values, averaging (0.686). Dividend Yield (0.018) settles around the average of (0.328) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.530) is also within normal values, averaging (0.827).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VFC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
XELB sees its Stochastic Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
On November 06, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for XELB moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 70 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 62 of the 70 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where XELB's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 33 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on XELB as a result. In 83 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XELB just turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where XELB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 47 of 55 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +10.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XELB advanced for three days, in 171 of 209 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XELB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
XELB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for XELB entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 35 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.205) is normal, around the industry mean (2.911). P/E Ratio (-0.142) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.016). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.075) is also within normal values, averaging (0.686). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.328) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.017) is also within normal values, averaging (0.827).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. XELB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. XELB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
VFC | XELB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XELB's Valuation (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VFC (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that XELB’s stock grew somewhat faster than VFC’s over the last 12 months.
XELB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as VFC (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that XELB’s stock grew similarly to VFC’s over the last 12 months.
VFC's SMR Rating (50) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XELB (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that VFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than XELB’s over the last 12 months.
VFC's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for XELB (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that VFC’s stock grew significantly faster than XELB’s over the last 12 months.
XELB's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for VFC (91) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that XELB’s stock grew significantly faster than VFC’s over the last 12 months.
| VFC | XELB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
VFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XELB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- VFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XELB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XELB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- VFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- XELB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
VFC (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while XELB (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
VFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2027.
XELB is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear (+0.19% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
Advertisement
VFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFC has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFC jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFC | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| SHOO - VFC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| LEVI - VFC | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| WWW - VFC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| NKE - VFC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| DECK - VFC | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||
XELB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XELB and RL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XELB and RL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XELB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XELB | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| RL - XELB | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| VFC - XELB | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| JL - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | +16.36% | ||
| VRA - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| CROX - XELB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPTM | 92.09 | 1.14 | +1.25% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) | |||
| BNOV | 48.78 | 0.43 | +0.88% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) | |||
| PSFJ | 35.91 | 0.28 | +0.78% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) | |||
| PMAR | 49.18 | 0.31 | +0.63% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) | |||
| BSTS | 24.85 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Invesco Bulletshares 2028 Treasury Bond ETF (BSTS) | |||