Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWEBX
JLCFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWEBX
JLCFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. JLCFX (6.36B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWEBX (0.75) vs JLCFX (0.31). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: JLCFX (17 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) and JLCFX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: JLCFX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. JLCFX (6.24). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.77 vs. JLCFX (1.62).
| JLCFX | RWEBX | JLCFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.06 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.06 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.141 | 5.239 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 214B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.75 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 7.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.26 | 29.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.62 | 22.77 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.93 | 78.62 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers