Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWEBX
JLCFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWEBX
JLCFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCFX (5.88B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWEBX (0.74) vs JLCFX (0.30). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: JLCFX (17 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) and JLCFX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: JLCFX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. JLCFX (-3.71). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.43 vs. JLCFX (-5.92).
| JLCFX | RWEBX | JLCFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.06 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.06 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.113 | 3.934 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.74 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.71 | 1.26 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.05 | 27.16 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.92 | 23.43 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.88 | 75.35 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement