KINS
Price
$14.91
Change
+$0.06 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
210.84M
38 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$30.78
Change
+$0.25 (+0.82%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
784.64M
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KINS vs UFCS

Header iconKINS vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts KINS vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Kingstone Companies
Price$14.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
Volume$146.75K
Capitalization210.84M
United Fire Group
Price$30.78
Change+$0.25 (+0.82%)
Volume$70.57K
Capitalization784.64M
KINS vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KINS vs. UFCS commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KINS is a Buy and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KINS: $14.91 vs. UFCS: $30.78)
Brand notoriety: KINS and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KINS: 78% vs. UFCS: 55%
Market capitalization -- KINS: $210.84M vs. UFCS: $784.64M
KINS [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $210.84M. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $784.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $142.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KINS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KINS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +8.91% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

KINS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.02% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UFCS($785M) has a higher market cap than KINS($211M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than KINS: UFCS (8.77) vs KINS (7.27). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 9.992 vs. KINS (-1.517). UFCS has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. KINS (133M). KINS has less debt than UFCS: KINS (5.06M) vs UFCS (117M). UFCS has higher revenues than KINS: UFCS (1.32B) vs KINS (186M).
KINSUFCSKINS / UFCS
Capitalization211M785M27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.5179.992-15%
P/E Ratio7.278.7783%
Revenue186M1.32B14%
Total Cash133M1.19B11%
Total Debt5.06M117M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KINS vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
KINS
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4264
SMR RATING
1..100
2369
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (76) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UFCS (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UFCS (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (97) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KINSUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZUUZF0.090.01
+10.02%
Zeus North America Mining Corp.
PKIUF27.640.21
+0.77%
Parkland Corp.
AMKAF2069.85N/A
N/A
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
KNMOF18.13N/A
N/A
Kanamoto Co Ltd.
MBOF38.93N/A
N/A
Marine Bancorp of Florida, Inc.

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
+0.40%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
ORI - KINS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
LMND - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
UFCS - KINS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
BOW - KINS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+0.82%
SAFT - UFCS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
L - UFCS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
AIZ - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
ORI - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
More