KMB
Price
$119.63
Change
-$2.70 (-2.21%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.69B
20 days until earnings call
PHH
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB vs PHH

Header iconKMB vs PHH Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs PHHBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark
Price$119.63
Change-$2.70 (-2.21%)
Volume$24.51K
Capitalization39.69B
Park Ha Biological Technology
Price$0.46
Change-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.85M
KMB vs PHH Comparison Chart in %
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMB vs. PHH commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMB is a StrongBuy and PHH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (KMB: $119.63 vs. PHH: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: KMB and PHH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 78% vs. PHH: 58%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $39.69B vs. PHH: $15.85M
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $39.69B. PHH’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $15.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $352.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PHH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than PHH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PHH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KMB and PHH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while PHH (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.58% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMB($39.7B) has a higher market cap than PHH($15.8M). PHH has higher P/E ratio than KMB: PHH (29.18) vs KMB (16.37). KMB YTD gains are higher at: -6.111 vs. PHH (-92.563).
KMBPHHKMB / PHH
Capitalization39.7B15.8M251,266%
EBITDA4BN/A-
Gain YTD-6.111-92.5637%
P/E Ratio16.3729.1856%
Revenue19.7BN/A-
Total Cash634MN/A-
Total Debt7.24BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs PHH: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
PHH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5518
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
11100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHH (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHH’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PHH (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to PHH’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHH (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than PHH’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PHH (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to PHH’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHH (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBPHH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHI60.470.51
+0.85%
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
MEMS26.830.09
+0.32%
Matthews Emerging Markets Discv Actv ETF
BSJS22.06-0.02
-0.09%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 HY Corp Bd ETF
WNTR29.16-0.04
-0.14%
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
PTBD19.79-0.03
-0.15%
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
-2.21%
PG - KMB
73%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
CL - KMB
70%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
CHD - KMB
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
UL - KMB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CLX - KMB
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More

PHH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PHH and CL have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHH and CL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHH
1D Price
Change %
PHH100%
-0.19%
CL - PHH
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
PG - PHH
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
EL - PHH
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
KMB - PHH
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
HELE - PHH
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More