This stock comparison examines KRMN (Karman Holdings Inc.) and MRCY (Mercury Systems, Inc.), two players in the aerospace and defense industry specializing in mission-critical components for hypersonics, missile defense, and space applications. Amid heightened geopolitical tensions and increased U.S. defense spending, these stocks offer exposure to high-growth areas like tactical missiles and integrated systems. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector tailwinds will find value in analyzing their recent performance, backlogs, and market positioning for informed relative performance decisions.
Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN), headquartered in Huntington Beach, California, designs, tests, manufactures, and sells mission-critical systems through its subsidiaries. Its products include payload protection, aerodynamic interstage, and propulsion systems for hypersonics, strategic missile defense, tactical missiles, integrated defense, space, and launch markets. Incorporated in 2020 and operating as a subsidiary of TCFIII Spaceco SPV LP, the company reported full-year 2025 revenue of $471.5 million, up 36.6% year-over-year, with Q4 revenue hitting a record $134.5 million.
In recent market activity, KRMN shares have faced downward pressure, declining from highs around $94 in mid-April to approximately $61 by early May 2026, reflecting broader sector volatility. Despite YTD returns of -16.85% and a 1-year gain of 57.62%, sentiment has been influenced by profit-taking after strong historical growth, with a market cap of $8.06 billion underscoring its scale. Positive factors include a funded backlog exceeding $1 billion as of March 2026 and raised 2026 revenue guidance to $715-730 million, supported by acquisitions like Seemann and MSC. Upcoming Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings on May 12, 2026, and insider buying signals could shift momentum.
Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) is a technology firm manufacturing components, modules, subsystems, and products for defense primes, OEMs (original equipment manufacturers), government, and commercial aerospace. Offerings span power amplifiers, RF (radio frequency)/microwave assemblies, embedded processing boards, digital receivers, and UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) systems, with operations in the U.S., Europe, and Asia Pacific. Founded in 1981 and headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts, it focuses on electronic warfare, radar simulation, and signals intelligence.
Recent weeks have seen MRCY gain traction, with shares rising from around $79 in late April to over $90 by early May 2026, buoyed by robust Q3 fiscal 2026 results announced May 5. Revenue reached $236 million, up 11.5% organically year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $0.27 beating estimates. Record bookings of $348 million (up 73.7%) yielded a 1.48 book-to-bill ratio and a $1.6 billion backlog, up 17.9%, driven by missile, C4I (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence), and space programs. YTD return stands at 23.74%, with 1-year gains of 96.26% and a $5.42 billion market cap, reflecting improved sentiment from margin expansion and guidance raise.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, chosen from over 351 total bots by advanced AI analysis for their suitability in current market conditions, particularly volatility. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as momentum, sector rotation, and pattern recognition—across timeframes from 15 minutes to swing trades, targeting sectors like semiconductors, industrials, space, and defense. Highlighted stats include annualized returns ranging from 23% to 285%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with standout aerospace-related bots achieving up to 192% returns. Traders can explore these high-conviction options for copy trading to potentially outperform benchmarks. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to review live performance and deploy bots aligned with your risk profile.
Both KRMN and MRCY thrive in aerospace and defense, but differ in focus: KRMN emphasizes structural systems for hypersonics and space launch, while MRCY specializes in electronics and processing for electronic warfare and radar. Growth drivers include defense budget increases, with MRCY's recent contract wins in SDA (Space Development Agency) Tranche 3 enhancing space exposure.
Recent momentum favors MRCY, up ~11.5% in recent weeks post-earnings, versus KRMN's ~30% pullback, though KRMN leads in scale with higher 1-year returns historically. Risk factors: KRMN shows higher volatility (52-week range $38-$118), while MRCY ($44-$104) benefits from diversified ~300 programs. Market sentiment tilts toward MRCY's backlog visibility ($891 million in 12 months) over KRMN's pending earnings, trading off size for execution stability.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MRCY due to superior recent trend consistency, record bookings, and backlog growth signaling stronger near-term catalysts and stability in aerospace and defense. While KRMN offers greater long-term upside from its larger scale and guidance, MRCY's relative positioning and positive earnings surprise provide higher probability of outperformance in the current environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KRMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KRMN (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while MRCY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +8.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.
KRMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
MRCY is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| KRMN | MRCY | KRMN / MRCY | |
| Capitalization | 6.34B | 7.22B | 88% |
| EBITDA | 138M | 88.4M | 156% |
| Gain YTD | -34.632 | 64.772 | -53% |
| P/E Ratio | 207.96 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 523M | 967M | 54% |
| Total Cash | 73.8M | 332M | 22% |
| Total Debt | 867M | 654M | 133% |
MRCY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KRMN | MRCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACA.X | 0.000663 | 0.000004 | +0.57% |
| Acala Token cryptocurrency | |||
| SM | 31.15 | -0.13 | -0.42% |
| SM Energy Company | |||
| ICX.X | 0.028965 | -0.000149 | -0.51% |
| ICON cryptocurrency | |||
| THETA.X | 0.154796 | -0.002451 | -1.56% |
| Theta Network cryptocurrency | |||
| SANTOS.X | 0.630126 | -0.010950 | -1.71% |
| Santos FC Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRMN has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRMN jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRMN | 100% | -3.53% | ||
| KTOS - KRMN | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| CW - KRMN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| BWXT - KRMN | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| HII - KRMN | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| DRS - KRMN | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCY has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCY jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRCY | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| KTOS - MRCY | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| CW - MRCY | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| DRS - MRCY | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| BWXT - MRCY | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| KRMN - MRCY | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.53% | ||
More | ||||