LANC
Price
$190.51
Change
-$0.99 (-0.52%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
6 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$65.72
Change
-$1.66 (-2.46%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
94.25B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LANC vs MDLZ

Header iconLANC vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LANC vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lancaster Colony
Price$190.51
Change-$0.99 (-0.52%)
Volume$500
Capitalization5.67B
Mondelez International
Price$65.72
Change-$1.66 (-2.46%)
Volume$4.55K
Capitalization94.25B
LANC vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANC vs. MDLZ commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Buy and MDLZ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LANC: $191.24 vs. MDLZ: $67.38)
Brand notoriety: LANC: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANC: 119% vs. MDLZ: 62%
Market capitalization -- LANC: $5.67B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
LANC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.67B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LANC is a better buy in the short-term than MDLZ.

Price Growth

LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.45% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.78% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than LANC($5.67B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: LANC (43.94) vs MDLZ (19.27). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 13.596 vs. LANC (11.003). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. LANC (244M). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LANC (134M). LANC has less debt than MDLZ: LANC (13.3M) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LANC: MDLZ (36B) vs LANC (1.87B).
LANCMDLZLANC / MDLZ
Capitalization5.67B94.3B6%
EBITDA244M7.65B3%
Gain YTD11.00313.59681%
P/E Ratio43.9419.27228%
Revenue1.87B36B5%
Total Cash134M1.81B7%
Total Debt13.3M19.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LANC vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LANC
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3927
SMR RATING
1..100
5252
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6440
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (42) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (43) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANCMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNSR30.850.87
+2.90%
Global X Internet of Things ETF
RHTX15.000.22
+1.51%
RH Tactical Outlook ETF
CVMC54.230.68
+1.26%
Calvert US Mid-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
GSY50.000.01
+0.02%
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
NUGT67.99-4.05
-5.62%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
+0.07%
JBSS - LANC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
FLO - LANC
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
MDLZ - LANC
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
JJSF - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
SENEA - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-1.33%
GIS - MDLZ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
CAG - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CPB - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
POST - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
HSY - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More