LANC
Price
$173.54
Change
-$1.66 (-0.95%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.67B
28 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$66.13
Change
-$1.52 (-2.25%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
94.25B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LANC vs MDLZ

Header iconLANC vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LANC vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lancaster Colony
Price$173.54
Change-$1.66 (-0.95%)
Volume$117.32K
Capitalization5.67B
Mondelez International
Price$66.13
Change-$1.52 (-2.25%)
Volume$11.36M
Capitalization94.25B
LANC vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANC vs. MDLZ commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Hold and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LANC: $173.54 vs. MDLZ: $66.13)
Brand notoriety: LANC: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANC: 73% vs. MDLZ: 105%
Market capitalization -- LANC: $5.67B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
LANC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.67B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LANC and MDLZ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LANC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.06% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than LANC($5.67B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: LANC (43.94) vs MDLZ (19.27). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 11.489 vs. LANC (0.730). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. LANC (244M). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LANC (134M). LANC has less debt than MDLZ: LANC (13.3M) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LANC: MDLZ (36B) vs LANC (1.87B).
LANCMDLZLANC / MDLZ
Capitalization5.67B94.3B6%
EBITDA244M7.65B3%
Gain YTD0.73011.4896%
P/E Ratio43.9419.27228%
Revenue1.87B36B5%
Total Cash134M1.81B7%
Total Debt13.3M19.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LANC vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LANC
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5637
SMR RATING
1..100
5252
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (41) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (82) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANCMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPT34.690.32
+0.93%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
TOK115.130.95
+0.84%
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
XJUL35.520.16
+0.46%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul
HIYS25.17N/A
N/A
Invesco High Yield Select ETF
VKQ9.69-0.07
-0.72%
Invesco Municipal Trust

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
-0.95%
JBSS - LANC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
SENEA - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
FLO - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
MDLZ - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
HAIN - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More