LEA
Price
$105.51
Change
+$1.51 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.26B
3 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$48.12
Change
-$0.17 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs PHIN

Header iconLEA vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts LEA vs PHINBanner chart's image
Lear
Price$105.51
Change+$1.51 (+1.45%)
Volume$809.04K
Capitalization8.26B
PHINIA
Price$48.12
Change-$0.17 (-0.35%)
Volume$308.53K
Capitalization1.78B
LEA vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. PHIN commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a Hold and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (LEA: $105.51 vs. PHIN: $48.12)
Brand notoriety: LEA and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 122% vs. PHIN: 71%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $8.26B vs. PHIN: $1.78B
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.26B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than LEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.21% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($1.78B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than LEA: PHIN (18.24) vs LEA (14.91). LEA YTD gains are higher at: 13.323 vs. PHIN (1.075). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. PHIN (433M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. PHIN (365M). PHIN has less debt than LEA: PHIN (864M) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than PHIN: LEA (23.5B) vs PHIN (3.5B).
LEAPHINLEA / PHIN
Capitalization8.26B1.78B464%
EBITDA1.48B433M342%
Gain YTD13.3231.0751,239%
P/E Ratio14.9118.2482%
Revenue23.5B3.5B671%
Total Cash1.2B365M328%
Total Debt2.92B864M338%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEAPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFICX88.550.05
+0.06%
American Funds Fundamental Invs C
ASPYX35.48N/A
N/A
Alger Spectra Y
HMVUX16.05N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value R6
ICMPX17.81N/A
N/A
Lazard International Quality Gr Instl
CEFIX14.07N/A
N/A
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement I

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.45%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
MGA - LEA
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
BWA - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ADNT - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-0.35%
BWA - PHIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
AXL - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
VC - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
ALV - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
LEA - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
More