LICYF vs WM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICYF is a Hold and WM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LICYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LICYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LICYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LICYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LICYF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -79.27% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
WM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (-0.39% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| LICYF | WM | LICYF / WM | |
| Capitalization | 184M | 85.6B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -121.4M | 5.59B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -89.693 | 15.853 | -566% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 37.62 | - |
| Revenue | 18.3M | 20.4B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 70.6M | 458M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 351M | 16.2B | 2% |
WM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LICYF | WM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 31% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 34% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 54% |
LICYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LICYF has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LICYF jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LICYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LICYF | 100% | -16.14% | ||
| NVRI - LICYF | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| AQMS - LICYF | 29% Poorly correlated | -7.11% | ||
| CLH - LICYF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| WM - LICYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CWST - LICYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||
WM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.