WFC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LQAI | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 53% | 20 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LQAI and JPM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQAI and JPM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LQAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQAI | 100% | N/A | ||
| JPM - LQAI | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PLTR - LQAI | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| PFE - LQAI | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| WRB - LQAI | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| WFC - LQAI | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.