LU
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.10 (-6.45%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LX
Price
$2.07
Change
-$0.17 (-7.59%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
341.11M
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs LX

Header iconLU vs LX Comparison
Open Charts LU vs LXBanner chart's image
LU vs LX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. LX commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Hold and LX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2026
Stock price -- (LU: $1.45 vs. LX: $2.07)
Brand notoriety: LU: Not notable vs. LX: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 127% vs. LX: 84%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.41B vs. LX: $341.11M
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.41B. LX’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $341.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $615.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $30.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than LX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the short-term than LX.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а -12.12% price change this week, while LX (@Savings Banks) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -4.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

LX is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-4.77% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.41B) has a higher market cap than LX($341M). LU has higher P/E ratio than LX: LU (20.60) vs LX (1.70). LX YTD gains are higher at: -31.089 vs. LU (-43.359). LU has higher revenues than LX: LU (20.3B) vs LX (13.8B).
LULXLU / LX
Capitalization2.41B341M707%
EBITDAN/A2.26B-
Gain YTD-43.359-31.089139%
P/E Ratio20.601.701,211%
Revenue20.3B13.8B147%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LX: Fundamental Ratings
LX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LULX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGOTX15.00N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Inv
AUXFX34.93-0.10
-0.29%
Auxier Focus Inv
ABLOX24.45-0.48
-1.93%
Alger Balanced I-2
STBIX551.33-14.90
-2.63%
State Street Equity 500 Index Svc
FHKIX70.02-4.41
-5.93%
Fidelity Advisor China Region I

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-6.45%
LX - LU
50%
Loosely correlated
-7.59%
FINV - LU
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
QFIN - LU
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.97%
JFIN - LU
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
YRD - LU
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

LX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LX has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LX jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LX
1D Price
Change %
LX100%
-7.59%
QFIN - LX
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.97%
FINV - LX
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
YRD - LX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
LU - LX
49%
Loosely correlated
-6.45%
JFIN - LX
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
More